Answers: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
getting rid of December
{{MovedToMetaWiki|Answers}}
Tag: Replaced
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Answers header}}
{{MovedToMetaWiki|Answers}}

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Answers<span style="display:none;">/en</span>}}
<div style="font-size:125%; background: #E6F2FF; border: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 10px;" class="plainlinks plainlinks2">
[[File:Contactus-wmcolors.svg|80px|left|link=]]
Do you have a question for or about the Wikimedia Foundation? Do you need the Foundation's help?<br>
<big><big>You need ''Answers''!</big></big><br>
<code>answers[[File:(at).svg]]wikimedia.org</code>

See [[Answers/Process]] for information and terms.
</div>
<div style="text-align:center; margin:2em auto;"><span style="font-size: 15pt;">Wikimedia Foundation – Answers</span></div>

<div style="float:right; margin-left:1.5em; width:30em;">
{{TOC right|limit=2}}
</div>
<div class="plainlinks">

==Finance: Where do donations come from?==
::The Huffington Post ''wrote on February 6 that Wikipedia donors are most likely to be from India: [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/06/wikipedia-most-likely-donate_n_1258575.html?ref=impact]. Is that true? Where do most donors live? Where does most of the money come from?''

Wikipedia and the other projects rely on the generosity of donors from all over the world. In 2011, money was donated from over 200 different countries. Donors from [[:en:India|India]] have certainly been generous in their support, with 39,000 people investing in the mission. However, India is not the country that produces the most donors to support Wikipedia and its sister projects.

It seems that this misunderstanding may arise from some confusion about [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/02/05/who-are-wikipedias-donors a recent survey]. The Wikimedia Foundation surveyed readers, not donors, and the readers who responded were asked about their willingness to donate. In [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/02/05/who-are-wikipedias-donors/#c their responses], readers from India (42%) expressed the strongest interest in donating to Wikipedia. This does not, however, reflect the actual demographic distribution of donors to the movement.

In 2011, most of the donors to support the movement were located in the [[:en:United States of America|United States of America]], with 535,666 people donating. Other countries with a high number of donors - over 39,000 - include [[:en:Germany|Germany]] (more than 160,000), [[:en:Italy|Italy]] (77,200), [[:en:Canada|Canada]] (58.141), [[:en:Australia|Australia]] (43,857), [[:en:the United Kingdom|the United Kingdom]] (more than 45,000), and [[:en:Russia|Russia]] (42,693). The United States is also the country that donates the largest amount of money, with donations totaling $14,398,721 USD in 2011. Germany was second in dollar amount. While all of the figures may not yet be in for the fundraiser that was held at the end of the year, as of this writing their total tally for 2011 is $5,430,724 USD. Also filling out the top five were the United Kingdom, [[:en:France|France]], and Canada, where donations totaled $1,682,151 USD, $1,345,933 USD and $1,334,899, respectively.

(Thanks to the Head of Annual Fundraiser Megan Hernandez for her assistance with this response. Dollar amounts are taken from the still evolving chart "2010-2011 Fundraiser by Country". Numbers are preliminary and may change, as not all bank transfers and checks have been tallied. Precise figures for numbers of donors throughout the year are not currently available for some areas where local chapters conducted fundraising, but in Germany and the United Kingdom the numbers known exceed 39,000.)

While certain countries may have greater numbers of donors and may collect higher amounts, the Wikimedia Foundation recognizes and appreciates the contributions of individuals everywhere. Its mission is global, and its supporters are global as well; whether one donor in [[:en:Djibouti|Djibouti]] or 6,500 in [[:en:Poland|Poland]], $5 USD in [[:en:Tonga|Tonga]] or $748,258 USD in [[:en:Japan|Japan]], every donor and every dollar represents commitment to our shared dream of a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. --[[User:Mdennis|Maggie Dennis]] 13:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


==Foundation: Is this your project? Determining whether or not a site belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation==
::''I found a website that looks like Wikipedia, and I can't tell if it belongs to you. How can I figure that out?''
[[File:WookieepediaMainPage.png|thumb|This is a screenshot of "Wookieepedia", a "wiki" that is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.]]

We routinely receive letters from readers who have found a site that looks like Wikipedia or that uses Wikipedia's content but that they suspect does not belong to us....particularly with parody sites, but also with other wikis, many of which may use the same MediaWiki software that we do.

Just because a site has "wiki" in its title or ''looks'' like Wikipedia doesn't mean it's a Wikimedia Foundation website or that it's reusing Wikipedia's content. "[[:w:Wiki|Wiki]]" is a generic term for any website that is collaboratively created by its user community. The [[w:History of wikis|history of wikis]] dates back to 1994, whereas our oldest project, Wikipedia, was launched in January 2001. While the names of our projects - Wikipedia, Wikiversity, Wikisource, etc. - are trademarked, people are free to use the term "Wiki" in describing or titling their own websites, and many do.

Beyond similarities in name, there may be similarities in design. Wikimedia Foundation projects are built on [[:w:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]], which - in keeping with our dedication to [http://freedomdefined.org/Definition free cultural work] - is [[w:Free and open-source software|free, open-source]] software that can be used by anyone in their own projects. While there may be some differences in configuration, projects that use MediaWiki may look and feel very similar to our own, even if their mission and content are entirely different.

Beyond projects that have similar name or software, but different content, there are also many "[[:w:Mirror (computer)|mirrors]]" and "[[:w:Fork (software development)|forks]]" which copy or base their material on content we host. In principle, we not only permit but encourage this. Our commitment is to creating a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. For that reason, almost all of the content on our projects is freely licensed for modification and reuse (see our [[Terms of Use]]). Many of these mirrors and forks share our educational goals, but there are also [[:w:Parody|parodies]] of Wikimedia Foundation projects that take our articles and modify them in ways that may be intended to be funny or offensive.

One easy way to determine if the site you've found is affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation is to look at [[Our projects|our project list]] (less common projects are [[:wmf:Special:SiteMatrix#Other projects of Wikimedia|listed here]].) You may also be able to tell by looking at the site in question itself. Generally, other sites that use the "wiki" title or use MediaWiki software are not intending to suggest an affiliation with us, and the distinction between us will be clear if you find the "about" or "contact" information. Even most mirrors and forks make clear that they are not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. It can be harder to figure out with some parodic sites, who may simply copy over the "contact" information from Wikipedia or the other project they're spoofing, and it may not always be a good idea to explore these sites too deeply, as some of them may host [[:w:malware|malware]]. If a site makes you uncomfortable, you can always check ''our'' lists or do a "[[:w:Whois|Whois]]" query to find out who hosts it. --[[User:Mdennis|Maggie Dennis]] ([[User talk:Mdennis|talk]]) 17:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:39, 19 September 2018