Talk:Staff and contractors: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:14, 5 August 2008

General inquiries are welcome at m:Wikimedia site feedback. If you would like to help translate this page, visit m:Translation_requests/WMF/Current_staff.

Should it be noted that Jimmy is indeed not a staff member, and that his omission is not an oversight? I'm sure most viewers (and contributors) have the impression that he is indeed a WMF staff member. -- Zanimum 12:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk at Meta?

Shouldn't this talk page contain a link to a talk page on Meta, where its content can be discussed? Although this page is probably not "written by the community" I think we could provide some useful input at times. // habj 17:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page?

I'm not really sure why this page is called "Current staff"; I suggest renaming it to simply "Staff". Any other opinions?--Eloquence 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it sounds better and will also look better at the same time :) E 07:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:39, 4 August 2008 view source Erik Moeller (WMF) (talk \| contribs) 783 edits →‎Rename page?: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:14, 5 August 2008 view source JamesR (talk \| contribs) 22 edits reply to Eloquence Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I'm not really sure why this page is called "Current staff"; I suggest renaming it to simply "Staff". Any other opinions?--[[User:Eloquence\|Eloquence]] 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)		I'm not really sure why this page is called "Current staff"; I suggest renaming it to simply "Staff". Any other opinions?--[[User:Eloquence\|Eloquence]] 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
			:Sure, it sounds better and will also look better at the same time :) [[User:E\|E]] 07:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)