Talk:Staff and contractors: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
MZMcBride (talk | contribs)
MZMcBride (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:


Should the "See also" section include a link to [[m:Wikimedia Foundation contractors]]? --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 06:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Should the "See also" section include a link to [[m:Wikimedia Foundation contractors]]? --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 06:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

== Missing an individual? ==

Karen Hyun? http://identi.ca/notice/52969121 --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 02:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:46, 27 October 2010

General inquiries are welcome at m:Foundation wiki feedback. If you would like to help translate this page, visit m:Translation_requests/WMF/Current_staff.


Should it be noted that Jimmy is indeed not a staff member, and that his omission is not an oversight? I'm sure most viewers (and contributors) have the impression that he is indeed a WMF staff member. -- Zanimum 12:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk at Meta?

Shouldn't this talk page contain a link to a talk page on Meta, where its content can be discussed? Although this page is probably not "written by the community" I think we could provide some useful input at times. // habj 17:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page?

I'm not really sure why this page is called "Current staff"; I suggest renaming it to simply "Staff". Any other opinions?--Eloquence 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it sounds better and will also look better at the same time :) E 07:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fellowship recipients

I think Fellowship recipients ought to be moved to a separate page. Calling them "staff" seems odd and wrong. Thoughts? --MZMcBride 02:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For now, we've created a Fellowship Recipient Section to this page to list Steven Walling who is being categorized during his year with us as an employee. We're blogging about the recipients and adding their announcements and links to the feed/streams on Identi.ca and Twitter. --Daniel Phelps 22:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC) (talkcontribs)[reply]
I agree. Also, the UX section ought to be merged into the Tech section (and some positions updated) since there are no longer any "UX programs". guillom 16:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is some reorganization to the Tech depts courtesy of the Strategic Plan. We're working on a way to clarify this new organization on the Staff page and should have that updated shortly (within the next 2-3 weeks). --Daniel Phelps 22:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC) (talkcontribs)[reply]

Should the "See also" section include a link to m:Wikimedia Foundation contractors? --MZMcBride 06:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing an individual?

Karen Hyun? http://identi.ca/notice/52969121 --MZMcBride 02:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]