User:Jd/Proposal/Press releases: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Jd (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
Jd (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
We currently have '''two'' places for press releases:
We currently have '''two''' places for press releases:
* [[Press room]] with the [[Press releases/]] system
* [[Press room]] with the [[Press releases/]] system
* [[:m:Wikimedia press releases]]
* [[:m:Wikimedia press releases]]


This is bad because the information is splitted in two rooms. It also complexifies the translation process. What about moving all press releases from the meta wiki to the foundation website? Press releases are official piece of information, aren't they? :)
This is '''bad''' because the information is splitted in two rooms. It also complexifies the translation process. What about moving all press releases from the meta wiki to the foundation website? Press releases are official piece of information, aren't they? :) I propose:
# the process of ''writing'' PR takes place on Internal (or, sometimes, on Meta);
# the final result is <u>always</u> available on wikimediafoundation.org.

Clean, efficient.

Latest revision as of 19:58, 7 August 2006

We currently have two places for press releases:

This is bad because the information is splitted in two rooms. It also complexifies the translation process. What about moving all press releases from the meta wiki to the foundation website? Press releases are official piece of information, aren't they? :) I propose:

  1. the process of writing PR takes place on Internal (or, sometimes, on Meta);
  2. the final result is always available on wikimediafoundation.org.

Clean, efficient.