User talk:Jorm: Difference between revisions
→User page: new section |
→Work with us: new section |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I made a few minor tweaks to your user page just now. <tt><nowiki>[[en:foo]]</nowiki></tt> links in a subject-space namespace go into the sidebar, which probably isn't what you wanted. The use of a <table> also seemed unnecessary, so I killed it in favor of a <div>. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 19:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
I made a few minor tweaks to your user page just now. <tt><nowiki>[[en:foo]]</nowiki></tt> links in a subject-space namespace go into the sidebar, which probably isn't what you wanted. The use of a <table> also seemed unnecessary, so I killed it in favor of a <div>. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 19:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
== [[Work with us]] == |
|||
Hi. Can you explain your reversions at [[Work with us]]? They seem to be purely disruptive. Are there issues with the new code? If so, could you explain what they are, please? Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 04:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:46, 25 January 2012
edit this template Welcome to the Wikimedia Foundation website.
Thanks for being here! This wiki does not exactly follow the same rules as the other Wikimedia projects, since it is not open to all for editing, and in case of disagreement, the organ of decision will be the Board. A rule of thumb however is that if we gave you access, that means we trust you. So please, do not be shy in editing this site. There is ample work for everyone :-)
- All organizational pages may be found in the special category.
- For those willing to help with translation, please see m:Translation requests, specially its subpages /WMF, /WMFNews and sometimes /quick translation.
- Please watch for feedback on Meta-Wiki and start discussions there.
- More about this wiki...
Killiondude 19:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
User page
I made a few minor tweaks to your user page just now. [[en:foo]] links in a subject-space namespace go into the sidebar, which probably isn't what you wanted. The use of a <table> also seemed unnecessary, so I killed it in favor of a <div>. --MZMcBride 19:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Can you explain your reversions at Work with us? They seem to be purely disruptive. Are there issues with the new code? If so, could you explain what they are, please? Thanks. --MZMcBride 04:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)