Photo by Jaluj, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Sometimes a negative experience may turn into a catalyst for change. Andrea Kleiman’s (Usuaria:Jaluj) interest in Wikipedia’s gender gap rose after reading a psychological article written by a male editor that she thought was sexist. This sparked Kleiman, an Argentine psychologist, to join Wikipedia. “I decided to [register] only to write in that article,” she recalls.

Surprising even herself, the article didn’t remain the last she edited. Since 2011, Kleiman has contributed tens of thousands of edits and arranged workshops for women in Argentina and Uruguay.

Kleiman is concerned about how fewer than 15 percent of Wikipedia editors are women, so she focuses on encouraging and engaging young women to edit Wikipedia. She believes young women need extra attention to feel comfortable in the editing environment. “Because I am old, I feel very secure about myself, about my knowledge, and about my voice. But younger women, they don’t feel like that. If somebody criticizes them, they feel bad and they [leave].”

As a way to narrow the gender gap, Wikimedia Argentina—a local affiliate of the Wikimedia movement—is now inviting influential women for breakfast to inform them about the importance of contributing to Wikipedia.

Among invitees, consisting of women working for Argentine government and beyond, a gender gap in society is generally a well-known problem. Wikipedia’s gender gap, however, has surprised many participants. Kleiman wants to correct these sorts of misconceptions. “We need to work to explain people that it’s not the reality, and that it’s important that women contribute too.”

Engaging more women editors brings out new perspectives. For Kleiman, it’s inadequate if the sum of human knowledge is written only by the half of the population. “Men have a different vision of the world, of the women, of what’s going on, and all of the articles are written from their own point of view. There is only one point of view, so I think it’s very important to have all points of views on Wikipedia,” Kleiman states. “I mean not only women, but men, minorities, different people from all over the world … not only white, men, and young”.

For her, Wikipedia is a powerful tool due to its potential to reach the entire world. “If I teach at the university, I can explain something to my students. But if I explain that in an article on Wikipedia, [many] more people will read it.”

Interview by Jonathan Curiel, Senior Development Communications Manager
Draft by Reetta Kemppi, Communications Volunteer
Wikimedia Foundation

Related

Read further in the pursuit of knowledge

From the archives Wikipedia Wikipedia Library

Writing an open-access encyclopedia in a closed-access world

On Friday, Elsevier, one of the world’s largest academic publishers, announced its recent partnership with the Wikipedia Library—a program that helps editors access reliable sources to improve Wikipedia. The collaboration gave 45 ScienceDirect accounts to Wikipedia volunteers, to use the database’s scholarly literature for research when writing and editing the encyclopedia. The announcement led to….

Communications From the archives Wikipedia

Despite headlines, frequent edits don’t cause inaccuracy

Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit. It didn’t surprise us to learn that articles considered to be controversial are frequently edited.

From the archives Gender gap Grantmaking Wikipedia

What we learned from the Inspire campaign to increase gender diversity on Wikimedia

The Inspire Campaign sought ideas for initiatives to increase gender diversity in Wikimedia projects. Community members proposed 266 ideas, leading to 16 grant-funded projects. Here's what we learned from this pilot.

Help us unlock the world’s knowledge.

As a nonprofit, Wikipedia and our related free knowledge projects are powered primarily through donations.

Donate

Connect —

Stay up-to-date about the Wikimedia Foundation

Get email updates

Subscribe to news about ongoing projects and initiatives.

Contact a human

Questions about the Wikimedia Foundation or our projects? Get in touch with our team.

Photo credits

I_Gente_de_Buenos_Aires_lead

Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg_open

Iceberg_Ilulissat_lead

Inspire_idea_totals_per_day