We are excited to announce the successful grantees from the first round of the Wikimedia Foundation’s new Project Grants program.
Project Grants support individuals, groups and organizations to implement new experiments and proven ideas, whether focused on building a new tool or gadget, organizing a better process on your wiki, researching an important issue, coordinating an editathon series or providing other support for community-building.
The Project Grants committee will score three rounds of grant proposals this fiscal year year according to specified selection criteria. The original pilot was to accept proposals quarterly, but this schedule is proving to be too compressed, especially considering the upcoming Movement Strategy work. We have also found that the new Rapid Grants program, which has a rolling submission deadline, is fulfilling a large part of the community’s funding needs. We are continuing to assess the new grants programs and how they meet the needs of the community and align with Foundation’s resources and capacity.
Our volunteer committee is made up of 17 Wikimedians who come from over 13 different wikis and collectively speak over 15 languages. Outside of our Project Grant committee work, members edit, review, and translate content; help govern local chapters; write software; organize off-wiki events; facilitate workshops; work as sysops and bureaucrats; verify copyright and licensing permissions; draft and discuss project policies; and recruit and welcome new users to Wikimedia projects. Many members also serve as advisors to new grantees, helping to answer questions, connect them to relevant resources, and comment on monthly and midpoint reports.
In this latest round, a total of 12 eligible proposals were submitted for the committee’s review. The committee recommended that six projects be funded to receive $180,396, divided into three themes: software, offline outreach, and research.
Software: three projects funded
- Librarybase: an online reference library: Improving the citation ecosystem for Wikipedia so editors can more easily look up relevant sources could greatly improve their productivity and ease of editing. This grant supports the development of Librarybase, a project to develop structured bibliographic data around citations. There are numerous benefits to creating this structure, especially for hard-to-model books, including the generation of source recommendations for specific topic areas or WikiProjects, migration of notable references to Wikidata, and more.
- Wikidata Module: One of the biggest challenges in using Wikidata content on Wikipedia is having a simple, user-friendly integration tool and workflow for editors. User:Putnik’s Wikidata module is currently used by over a million articles on Russian Wikipedia to add information from Wikidata to article infoboxes. Through this project, Putnik will improve the Lua module to make it easier to install, easy to integrate with infoboxes without knowledge of Lua, configurable for the most common use cases, and extendable.
- WikiFactMine: Contentmine software helps turn peer-reviewed literature into Wikidata-based facts. It can crawl up to 10,000 articles per day sourcing information and making it available for integration into the database. This project will build infrastructure to connect ContentMine to Wikidata, creating an accelerated conduit to populate Wikidata with new datasets. It will also place a Wikipedian in Residence at Cambridge University to coordinate human curation of data extracted from WikiFactMine.
Offline outreach: two projects funded
- A Wikipedian-in-residence to engage 500 librarians and their communities: Public libraries and librarians are natural partners for the Wikimedia movement, sharing a commitment to free access to knowledge. A leader in the library field, the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) has secured funding from the Knight Foundation to capitalize on this synergy and create a national training program for 500 public librarians to build skills in editing Wikipedia and implement Wikimedia programming for their local community members. This grant funds a Wikipedian-in-Residence at OCLC to serve as the content expert in developing training materials, understanding Wikimedia community norms, and mentoring librarians.
- Why women don’t edit Wikipedia: Wikimedia Community User Group Greece will partner with two Greek women’s organizations, SheSharp and Telesilla, to better understand the challenges faced by Greek women in participating in the Wikimedia projects. They will utilize their collective networks to build awareness about editing Wikipedia, conduct trainings, and provide mentorship based on their learnings.
Research: one project funded
- Strengthening indigenous-language Wikipedias in Latin America: Previous attempts to engage indigenous language communities in developing new Wikipedias have been been met with many challenges and varying degrees of success. Global Voices, a nonprofit focused on digital activism and with deep networks in Latin America, will work with Wikimedia affiliates in the region to review the existing active and incubator Wikipedia projects in the indigenous languages of Latin America. By mapping successes and challenges, the team will develop best practices and guidelines for how to support communities that are interested in developing their indigenous language community and important learnings for both WMF and the Wikimedia community on if and how we can best support them.
Analysis of trends
The first round of the Project Grants program saw some new trends, some that reflect the unique potential of this new program, and others that carry forward themes we’ve seen in many previous rounds.
When we launched Project Grants, we experimented with a new funding ceiling of $100,000 USD. This is a significant increase from the programs that Project Grants replaced: Individual Engagements Grants previously had a ceiling of $30,000, while Project and Event Grants did not have a cap but typically were in the $5,000-$30,000 range.
The new, higher threshold ushered in projects at a scale higher than we’ve seen before, with strong potential to have larger impact on central problems of the Wikimedia movement. For example, A Wikipedian-in-residence to engage 500 librarians and their communities, funded at $70,000, aims to equip 500 public libraries with training and infrastructure to support Wikimedia programming. This reflects a powerful leap in the scale of outreach since it targets not just individuals but organizations embedded in local communities across the United States.
Likewise, WikiFactMine promises to have a much greater scale of impact than most software grants we’ve awarded in the past. If successful, it will powerfully accelerate the process by which new datasets are integrated into Wikidata over time, at a scale that simply wouldn’t be possible without the innovative technology this project enables.
This round, all three funded software proposals will engage in improving or expanding Wikidata. Through our interviews with applicants and consultations with experts, we encountered a great deal of excitement about Wikidata’s potential both to support other Wikimedia projects and to serve as a landmark project in its own right, capable of attracting an increasingly broad audience of dedicated users as its capacity is realized. Given the promising use cases under development for Wikidata–such as WikiCite, for example, we are delighted to be able to support experimentation around new tools that can help this project continue to expand.
We continue to see our applicants demonstrate a longstanding priority for expanding the diversity and inclusiveness of Wikimedia projects. The Wikimedia Foundation celebrates and supports this trend. This round, we will fund two relevant projects. Why women don’t edit Wikipedia will raise awareness about how sexism impacts Wikipedia and increase female participation in Greece. Strengthening indigenous-language Wikipedias in Latin America will take a deeper diver into understanding how our projects might be able to engage small language communities. As language extinction advances around the globe, we are eager to see what Global Voices’ research will discover about applications for Wikimedia projects in their work in language revitalization activism.
We received many compelling proposals this year that the committee decided not to fund. We encourage applicants who were not successful in this round of funding to refine and resubmit their proposals in upcoming rounds. Return proposals that have been revised in response to community and committee feedback are warmly welcomed. The open call for Project Grants Round Two is currently underway, with applications due October 11.
We look forward to reviewing your suggestions and future submissions, but for now we say congratulations to the successful grantees and encourage you to follow their progress as they begin work in the coming weeks.
Alex Wang, Senior Project Manager
Marti Johnson, Program Officer, Individual Grants