Resolution:Auditor selection: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Angela (talk | contribs)
m correction
+ {{resolution}}, + metadata
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{resolution
|title = Auditor selection
|notes = This resolution selecting an auditor firm recommended by the [[m:Wikimedia committees#Audit committee|audit committee]] was approved on 19 April 2006 (4 support, 1 abstain). See also [[Resolution:Audit committee]].
}}

Whereas the Audit Committee has conducted interviews of accounting firms to perform the Foundation's audit and has selected a firm which they are recommending to the Board for approval;
Whereas the Audit Committee has conducted interviews of accounting firms to perform the Foundation's audit and has selected a firm which they are recommending to the Board for approval;


Line 11: Line 16:


(The original resolution included the costs of the audit, which have been removed from this page)
(The original resolution included the costs of the audit, which have been removed from this page)

----

4 support. 1 abstentions

Revision as of 08:01, 9 May 2008

Resolutions Auditor selection Feedback?
This resolution selecting an auditor firm recommended by the audit committee was approved on 19 April 2006 (4 support, 1 abstain). See also Resolution:Audit committee.

Whereas the Audit Committee has conducted interviews of accounting firms to perform the Foundation's audit and has selected a firm which they are recommending to the Board for approval;

It is hereby resolved that:

The accounting firm, (name removed), shall be retained by the Foundation to:

  1. Prepare an audit of the Foundation from inception to 30-Jun-05
  2. Prepare an audit of the Foundation for the fiscal year ending 30-Jun-2006
  3. Prepare tax returns
  4. Optionally, prepare quarterly reviews of financial statements

(The original resolution included the costs of the audit, which have been removed from this page)