Resolution talk:Auditor selection: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Angela (talk | contribs)
sorry... can't say
Alvaro (talk | contribs)
m ::Ok, Angela, merci pour ta réponse. ~~~~
Line 2: Line 2:


:One member of the audit committee objected to the costs being posted. Since most people can't log in to this wiki to discuss it here, I think it would be better for such issues to be raised on foundation-l or to the board address, rather than here. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 12:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
:One member of the audit committee objected to the costs being posted. Since most people can't log in to this wiki to discuss it here, I think it would be better for such issues to be raised on foundation-l or to the board address, rather than here. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 12:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
::Ok, [[User:Angela|Angela]], merci pour ta réponse. [[User:Alvaro|Alvaro]] 10:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:00, 28 April 2006

(The original resolution included the costs of the audit, which have been removed from this page). Why ? That's not a political question, like transparency or such. I'm just curious of the scale of the amounts of money the wikimedia foundation is dealing with. Alvaro 13:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One member of the audit committee objected to the costs being posted. Since most people can't log in to this wiki to discuss it here, I think it would be better for such issues to be raised on foundation-l or to the board address, rather than here. Angela 12:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Angela, merci pour ta réponse. Alvaro 10:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]