User talk:Mono: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
MZMcBride (talk | contribs)
MZMcBride (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:


Thanks, jvandavier 19:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, jvandavier 19:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

: Hi.
: Thank you for updating your note here to not include anything about a possible privacy policy violation. I looked at the code for [[Template:Social accounts]] and it's fine.
: I wouldn't call Mono's changes drastic. He just replaced the social media icons. That whole page is a bit ugly and could use a refresh (unless it's meant to fit inside of some pretty wrapper somewhere...). The view that anyone should be getting prior approval before updating pages is a bit [[w:WP:BOLD|anti-wiki]], eh? There can be a healthy [[w:WP:BRD|BRD]] cycle here without much issue, I think.
: We've now entered the "D" (discussion) stage. So it'd be helpful if you could explain why you didn't like Mono's change (besides the lack of consultation). That way, the changes can be reimplemented appropriately. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 03:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:37, 6 November 2012

social media links

Hey Mono,

I reverted your edits to the donation thank you page. We'd prefer if you contacted someone on the team before changing pages so drastically in the future :)

Thanks, jvandavier 19:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi.
Thank you for updating your note here to not include anything about a possible privacy policy violation. I looked at the code for Template:Social accounts and it's fine.
I wouldn't call Mono's changes drastic. He just replaced the social media icons. That whole page is a bit ugly and could use a refresh (unless it's meant to fit inside of some pretty wrapper somewhere...). The view that anyone should be getting prior approval before updating pages is a bit anti-wiki, eh? There can be a healthy BRD cycle here without much issue, I think.
We've now entered the "D" (discussion) stage. So it'd be helpful if you could explain why you didn't like Mono's change (besides the lack of consultation). That way, the changes can be reimplemented appropriately. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]