Requests for content alteration and takedown

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.

The Wikimedia projects make up one of the world’s largest repositories of human knowledge. With that much information, someone is bound to get upset by some of the content from time to time. While the vast majority of content disputes are resolved by users themselves, in some extreme cases the Wikimedia Foundation may receive a legal demand to override our users.

The Wikimedia projects are yours, not ours. People just like you from around the world write, upload, edit, and curate all of the content. Therefore, we believe users should decide what belongs on Wikimedia projects whenever legally possible.

Below, you will find more information about the number of requests we receive, where they come from, and how they could impact free knowledge. You can also learn more about how we fight for freedom of speech through our user assistance programs in the FAQ.

This report covers requests we received between January and June, 2026. For historical data, please see our past reports.

Alteration and takedown requests from governments

Requests for content alteration and takedown

Government requests breakdown

Country	Entity	Requests
Australia	Independent Federal Agency	1
France	Public Institution	1
Germany	Local Government	1
Italy	Cyber police	1
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia	Federal Agency	1
Luxembourg	National Commission	1
Mexico	Federal Agency	1
New Zealand	District Court	1
Republic of South Korea	Federal Agency	1
Russian Federation	Federal Agency	31
Turkey	Federal Agency	1
United Kingdom	Regional Police	1
United States of America	Federal Commission Federal Police Military Branch	1 1 1

Requests for content alteration and takedown by project

Project Affected	Requests	Granted
English Wikipedia	592	0
Wikimedia Commons	111	2
Multiple Projects	48	0
German Wikipedia	35	0
Russian Wikipedia	24	0
Wikidata	19	0
French Wikipedia	16	0
Spanish Wikipedia	13	0
Italian Wikipedia	12	0
Turkish Wikipedia	12	0
Japanese Wikipedia	11	0
Arabic Wikipedia	8	0
Not a Wikimedia Site	8	0
Portuguese Wikipedia	8	0
Czech Wikipedia	4	0
Dutch Wikipedia	4	0
Polish Wikipedia	4	0
Bulgarian Wikipedia	3	0
Chinese Wikipedia	3	0
Greek Wikipedia	3	0
Hebrew Wikipedia	3	0
Norwegian Wikipedia	3	0
Korean Wikipedia	2	0
Malay Wikipedia	2	0
Russian Wikinews	2	0
Ukrainian Wikipedia	2	0
Albanian Wikipedia	1	0
Arabic Wikisource	1	0
Armenian Wikipedia	1	0
Azerbaijani Wikipedia	1	0
Catalan Wikipedia	1	0
Chinese Wikisource	1	0
Croatian Wikipedia	1	0
Danish Wikipedia	1	0
Egyptian Wikipedia	1	0
English Wikisource	1	0
Esperanto Wikipedia	1	0
Farsi Wikipedia	1	0
Finnish Wikipedia	1	0
Georgian Wikipedia	1	0
Hindi Wikipedia	1	0
Latvian Wikipedia	1	0
Meta-Wiki	1	0
Serbian Wikipedia	1	0
Slovak Wikipedia	1	0
Thai Wikipedia	1	0
Turkish Wikisource	1	0
Turkish Wiktionary	1	0
Unknown	3	0

Requests for content alteration and takedown by country

Country of Origin	Requests	Granted
United States of America	56	0
Germany	43	0
Russian Federation	35	0
France	24	0
United Kingdom	18	0
Turkey	14	0
India	12	0
Italy	12	0
Japan	12	0
Netherlands	11	0
Poland	9	0
Austria	7	0
Canada	7	0
Czech Republic	5	0
Switzerland	5	0
Argentina	4	0
Australia	4	1
Brazil	4	0
Spain	4	0
Croatia	3	0
Finland	3	0
Greece	3	0
Republic of South Korea	3	0
Belgium	2	0
China	2	0
Denmark	2	0
Georgia	2	0
Iran	2	0
Israel	2	0
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia	2	0
Luxembourg	2	0
New Zealand	2	0
Peru	2	0
Portugal	2	0
Sweden	2	0
Azerbaijan	1	0
Estonia	1	0
Ghana	1	0
Ireland	1	0
Jordan	1	0
Kosovo	1	0
Kyrgyzstan	1	0
Latvia	1	0
Libya	1	0
Malta	1	0
Mexico	1	0
Nepal	1	0
Nigeria	1	0
Norway	1	0
Romania	1	0
Slovakia	1	0
Sri Lanka	1	0
Thailand	1	0
Unknown	612	1

Child Safety Reports

The global community of volunteer contributors to the Wikimedia projects, along with the Wikimedia Foundation, have developed and tailored practices to address potentially illegal content on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.

Robust community-led content moderation processes provide the first line of defense. While automated tools are used to support existing community processes, the bulk of this work is done manually across Wikimedia projects.

Situations involving actual or suspected Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) are escalated to the Foundation’s Trust & Safety team. This team utilizes PhotoDNA, an automated tool, to identify known CSAM images and videos, and report them to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), a nonprofit that refers cases to law enforcement agencies around the world. 

While CSAM has been found on Wikimedia projects, it is very rare. When actual or suspected CSAM is identified, we immediately lock the account(s) that upload the content and escalate the information to NCMEC’s CyberTipline, as required by law. Each report to NCMEC may involve one or more pieces of content. For our annual CyberTipline report totals from previous years, please see: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020.

Right to Erasure

The Right to Erasure, or Right to be Forgotten, is a right under the laws of various countries that allows individuals to request that certain information relating to them be delisted or removed.

When we receive a Right to Erasure request regarding project content, we first direct the requester to experienced project volunteers, who routinely handle most requests to change content on the projects. Wikimedia projects have guidelines for content about living persons, and the volunteer community can review the guidelines and work with the requester to address their concerns.

When we receive a request relating to a user account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. See the account-related requests section below for more detail on these requests.

We believe in a Right to Remember. Everyone should have free access to relevant and neutral information of public concern; delisting and removing such content from the internet harms our collective ability to remember history and understand the world. In October 2016, we filed a petition to intervene in Google’s appeal of a French administrative order that would expand such delistings from the European Union to all global domains. In March 2020, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice limiting the geographic scope of such removals, the French court quashed the order, and the French agency behind it has adjusted its position.

* Please note that this information only reflects requests made directly to us. Wikimedia project pages continue to disappear from search engine results without any notice or request to us. We have a dedicated page where we post notices of delisted project pages that we have received from the search engines who provide such information as part of their own commitments to transparency.

Account related requests

Many of the requests we receive ask for changes to project content, or request that we provide data about our users. However, some requests pertain to user accounts.

Account deletion

When we receive a request to delete a user’s account, we provide the user information on the community-driven vanishing process. Prior to July 2019, account deletion requests were reported in the “Right to Erasure” section. We are now reporting these requests separately in order to give users additional clarity on the types of requests we receive.

Unblock Requests

On occasion, a user who has been blocked by the community may contact the Foundation to request that we take action to reverse the block. The Foundation supports the community’s ability to issue blocks in order to protect users and the projects, and appeals to us when a user has been blocked for disruptive behavior will not result in reinstatement.