Archive talk:Wikipedia Zero Operating Principles: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 9 years ago by YWelinder (WMF) in topic Phrasing so they could be 10 principles of any similar A2K program
Content deleted Content added
+abstract version |
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) m GVarnum-WMF moved page Talk:Wikipedia Zero Operating Principles to Archive talk:Wikipedia Zero Operating Principles |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Phrasing so they could be 10 principles of any similar A2K program== |
== Phrasing so they could be 10 principles of any similar A2K program== |
||
It would be great to see a version of these 10 principles that don't mention WM explicitly, but define the precepts we follow. Then we could encourage similar projects to follow the same, in contributing to an Access to Knowledge coalition. The case for zero-rating free knowledge is much stronger when it's applied to a constellation of sources. [[user:sj|SJ]] [[user talk:sj|+]] 22:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC) |
It would be great to see a version of these 10 principles that don't mention WM explicitly, but define the precepts we follow. Then we could encourage similar projects to follow the same, in contributing to an Access to Knowledge coalition. The case for zero-rating free knowledge is much stronger when it's applied to a constellation of sources. [[user:sj|SJ]] [[user talk:sj|+]] 22:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
:We hope to put together something like this as part of the A2K coalition. Stay tuned! :) [[User:YWelinder (WMF)|YWelinder (WMF)]] ([[User talk:YWelinder (WMF)|talk]]) 00:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:17, 13 August 2021
Open Source and Free Software
Hello, please consider the possibility of changing Promoting open-source to Promoting free software or Promoting FLOSS. As Richard Stallman put it "Open Source misses the point". -- CristianCantoro (talk) 10:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- That's a good point. We'll keep this in mind for the next iteration. YWelinder (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Phrasing so they could be 10 principles of any similar A2K program
It would be great to see a version of these 10 principles that don't mention WM explicitly, but define the precepts we follow. Then we could encourage similar projects to follow the same, in contributing to an Access to Knowledge coalition. The case for zero-rating free knowledge is much stronger when it's applied to a constellation of sources. SJ + 22:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- We hope to put together something like this as part of the A2K coalition. Stay tuned! :) YWelinder (WMF) (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)