Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines: Difference between revisions
Der-Wir-Ing (talk | contribs) →Anglocentricitet: Reply |
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
(39 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig
|archive = Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(180d)
|counter = 1
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
}}{{Universal Code of Conduct/Talk}}
== Opt Out? Seriously ==
== Voting results are in ==
This message is ''only'' for people who forgot to add the voting information page to their watchlist. Voting results for the UCOC Enforcement Guidelines have been [[m:Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Voting_statistics|published]]. 76% support, 24% oppose. Personally, I'm satisfied with the results. [[User:Adrianmn1110|Adrianmn1110]] ([[User talk:Adrianmn1110|talk]]) 20:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
:I am surprised that there is 24% oppose. We should analyze deeply what things make them say NO with the UCoC. [[User:Alphama|<span style="background:#16BCDA;color:white;border-radius:4px;"> <b>A</b> l p h a m a </span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alphama|Talk]]</sup> 10:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
== What is the content of the training and is it public ? ==
I am a bit lost regarding the concrete nature of the training. Is there or will there be some material (like online documents, videos, etc.) that will somehow fix the content of the training. Would that material be public ? [[User:Dominic Mayers|Dominic Mayers]] ([[User talk:Dominic Mayers|talk]]) 00:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
: OK, I just realized that the training is not yet elaborated. It is something planned. In my view, this is the most important part. [[User:Dominic Mayers|Dominic Mayers]] ([[User talk:Dominic Mayers|talk]]) 12:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 20:53, 26 March 2024
This page is for discussions related to the page. Please remember to:
Discussion navigation:
Archives: 1 |
Opt Out? Seriously
Any website that forces you to opt-out of unsolicited e-mails can go screw itself. What is this, 2001? Change this process immediately and stop bothering people who DO NOT CARE. This account is retired anyway. Shadow2 (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Voting results are in
This message is only for people who forgot to add the voting information page to their watchlist. Voting results for the UCOC Enforcement Guidelines have been published. 76% support, 24% oppose. Personally, I'm satisfied with the results. Adrianmn1110 (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am surprised that there is 24% oppose. We should analyze deeply what things make them say NO with the UCoC. A l p h a m a Talk 10:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
What is the content of the training and is it public ?
I am a bit lost regarding the concrete nature of the training. Is there or will there be some material (like online documents, videos, etc.) that will somehow fix the content of the training. Would that material be public ? Dominic Mayers (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I just realized that the training is not yet elaborated. It is something planned. In my view, this is the most important part. Dominic Mayers (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)