Policy:Office actions: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
official policy template
subst'ing policy template - i intend to edit it to reflect that this policy comes from Jimbo, not the usual process
Line 1: Line 1:

{{policy2|[[WP:OFFICE]]}}
{| class="messagebox"
|-
| [[Image:Green check.png|30px]]
||'''This page is an [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|official policy]] on the English Wikipedia.''' It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Feel free]] to edit the page as needed, but please make sure that changes you make to this policy reflect [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] before you make them.
|class="noprint hiddenStructure[[WP:OFFICE]]" style="width: 1em"|
!id="shortcut" class="noprint hiddenStructure[[WP:OFFICE]]" style="border: 1px solid #999; background: #fff; margin: 0 0 .5em 1em; text-align: center; padding: 5px"|
<small>[[Wikipedia:Shortcut|Shortcut]]:<br />[[WP:OFFICE]]</small>
|}[[Category:Wikipedia official policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{Policylist}}
{{Policylist}}



Revision as of 02:41, 28 February 2006

This page is an official policy on the English Wikipedia. It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. Feel free to edit the page as needed, but please make sure that changes you make to this policy reflect consensus before you make them. class="noprint hiddenStructureWP:OFFICE" style="width: 1em"| id="shortcut" class="noprint hiddenStructureWP:OFFICE" style="border: 1px solid #999; background: #fff; margin: 0 0 .5em 1em; text-align: center; padding: 5px"|

Shortcut:
WP:OFFICE

Template:Policylist

Please note that this is official policy, and reverting a WP:OFFICE may be grounds for blocking. I do not recommend that admins block for this, I'm just saying... don't revert a WP:OFFICE edit unless and until you've asked and know what you are doing. There may at times be legal reasons for this.

The Wikimedia Foundation receives an increasingly large number of phone calls and emails from people who are upset about various things on the site. Sometimes these complaints are valid; more often they are not. However, in most cases, even with the invalid complaints, there is a short-term action which can and should be taken as a courtesy in order to soothe feelings and build a better encyclopedia in the long run.

A typical example: someone creates a vanity bio in Wikipedia, which is quickly nominated for deletion. The comments which ensue, even when they are completely courteous, can hurt the feelings of the person being discussed. The sort of person who is vain enough to create an autobiography in Wikipedia is also the sort of person who doesn't take well to being described as 'non-notable'.

When such people call the office, it can be the best approach all around for us to simply speedy the article, blank the deletion discussion, and all get on with our lives. This quick action is in no way meant to override or replace the process of community consensus. There is still plenty of time, and there are still plenty of places, for the community to discuss and replace articles in due course.

I have created this page for Danny to use to signify why he is deleting or blanking something per my authorization. This does not signify any authoritarian top-down action without approval, but rather signifies a temporary action to allow us to be kind while we sort out the encyclopedic way forward.

If this works out, I may authorize other people to use it as well (people handling OTRS email queues, people on the legal team, etc.)--Jimbo Wales 21:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)