Agenda talk:2013-11/Frequently asked questions: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Sj in topic User groups: 'why now'
Content deleted Content added
m Sj moved page Talk:Movement roles FAQ to Talk:WMF Board meetings/2013-11-24/FAQ: subpage |
+priors updated |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">–[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small> [[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]] </small></span> 09:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
<span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">–[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small> [[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]] </small></span> 09:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::SJ, with all respect, your proposed text would be a slight departure from the truth and would feel disrespectful to me (and perhaps to other members of AffCom). --[[User:Bdamokos|Bence]] ([[User talk:Bdamokos|talk]]) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
:: SJ, with all respect, your proposed text would be a slight departure from the truth and would feel disrespectful to me (and perhaps to other members of AffCom). --[[User:Bdamokos|Bence]] ([[User talk:Bdamokos|talk]]) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::: Thank you, Bence. I also received a clarifying email about this today. This subthread was useful for me, since my understanding of the discussions leading up to the decision had been different. In that case, this paragraph could be removed; the end of the FAQ covers the discussion after the decision was made, and there is no need to repeat it. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">–[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small> [[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]] </small></span> 18:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:23, 11 February 2014
User groups: 'why now'
The consultation process could be made clearer. The last paragraph could be rewritten:
- "We consulted with AffCom and the WMF Executive Director in making this decision. The ED endorsed it, AffCom did not, but we took the committee's concerns into account."
–SJ talk 09:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- SJ, with all respect, your proposed text would be a slight departure from the truth and would feel disrespectful to me (and perhaps to other members of AffCom). --Bence (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, Bence. I also received a clarifying email about this today. This subthread was useful for me, since my understanding of the discussions leading up to the decision had been different. In that case, this paragraph could be removed; the end of the FAQ covers the discussion after the decision was made, and there is no need to repeat it. –SJ talk 18:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)