Minutes talk:2012-12-01: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Slaporte (WMF)
Content deleted Content added
Peteforsyth (talk | contribs) m clean up Tag: Reverted |
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) m Copying from Category:Minutes to Category:Governance wiki using Cat-a-lot Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In response to [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-January/123461.html this question from Pine on Wikimedia-l]: The Florida statute for nonprofit organizations does not require attendance at a board meeting before allowing a trustee to vote on the minutes of the meeting. There is no statutory requirement for recusal in these circumstances. This is especially true when the meeting is an IRC chat and the dialogue is completely recorded for the absent trustee to review. There are certain quorum mandates, which have always been observed by the Board. Thanks, [[User:Slaporte (WMF)|Stephen LaPorte (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Slaporte (WMF)|talk]]) 21:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
In response to [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-January/123461.html this question from Pine on Wikimedia-l]: The Florida statute for nonprofit organizations does not require attendance at a board meeting before allowing a trustee to vote on the minutes of the meeting. There is no statutory requirement for recusal in these circumstances. This is especially true when the meeting is an IRC chat and the dialogue is completely recorded for the absent trustee to review. There are certain quorum mandates, which have always been observed by the Board. Thanks, [[User:Slaporte (WMF)|Stephen LaPorte (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Slaporte (WMF)|talk]]) 21:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
[[Category:Minutes]] |
[[Category:Minutes]] |
||
[[Category:Governance wiki]] |
Revision as of 02:10, 19 September 2018
In response to this question from Pine on Wikimedia-l: The Florida statute for nonprofit organizations does not require attendance at a board meeting before allowing a trustee to vote on the minutes of the meeting. There is no statutory requirement for recusal in these circumstances. This is especially true when the meeting is an IRC chat and the dialogue is completely recorded for the absent trustee to review. There are certain quorum mandates, which have always been observed by the Board. Thanks, Stephen LaPorte (WMF) (talk) 21:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)