Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions
→third party cookies: new section |
ArchiverBot (talk | contribs) m Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 180 days) to Talk:Privacy policy/Archives/2015. |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|archive = Talk:Privacy policy/Archives/%(year)d |
|archive = Talk:Privacy policy/Archives/%(year)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Do Facebook and the USA violate EU data protection law? The CJEU hearing in Schrems == |
|||
Very interesting debate summary in here: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/does-facebook-and-usa-violate-eu-data.html --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 14:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== conspiracy to another == |
== conspiracy to another == |
||
Revision as of 07:56, 5 November 2015
Template:Privacy policy talk header User:MiszaBot/config
conspiracy to another
when conspiraring against another will get 30 years behind bars. and when ones constition rights have been violated or controlled the fed should now intervien and take action and track eack person down and prosecute them my computer will be turned into the feds and they can track what others have done
third party cookies
The policy states We will never use third-party cookies, unless we get your permission to do so. Where it uses third-party cookies to mean cookies from domains not under control of the WMF. However, wikipedia defines the term as "Third-party cookies, however, belong to domains different from the one shown in the address bar", which is something we do use. I think that line in the privacy policy should be clarified. Bawolff (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)