Codice Universal de Conducta del Fundation Wikimedia

Vole adjutar a traducer? Traduce le messages mancante.

Proque nos ha un Codice Universal de Conducta

Nos crede que es necessari dar al maxime numero possibile de personas le poter de participar activemente in projectos e spatios de Wikimedia, a fin de attinger nostre vision de un mundo in le qual omnes pote contribuer al totalitate del cognoscentia human. Nos crede que nostre communitates de contributores debe esser tanto diverse, inclusive e accessibile como possibile. Nos vole que iste communitates sia ambientes positive, secur e salubre pro omnes qui adhere (e qui vole adherer) a illos. Nos es dedicate a garantir que remane assi, incluse per medio del adoption de iste Codice de Conducta e su reexamination pro actualisationes quando necessari. In ultra, nos desira proteger nostre projectos contra illes qui damnifica o distorque le contento.

In accordo con le mission de Wikimedia, cata uno qui participa in projectos e spatios de Wikimedia:

adjuta a crear un mundo in le qual omnes pote liberemente condivider le totalitate del cognoscentia;
face parte de un communitate global que evita le preconceptiones e partialitates;
se effortia pro accuratessa e verificabilitate in tote su labor.

Iste Codice Universal de Conducta (CUC) defini un gruppo de directivas minime pro comportamento expectate e inacceptabile. Illo se applica a omnes qui interage e contribue a projectos e spatios de Wikimedia in linea e foras de linea. Isto include le contributores nove e experte, functionarios intra le projectos, organisatores e participantes de eventos, empleatos e membros del consilio de administration de affiliatos e empleatos e membros del consilio de administration del Fundation Wikimedia. Illo se applica a tote le projectos de Wikimedia, spatios technic, eventos in persona e virtual, como etiam al sequente casos:

interactiones private, public e semipublic;
discussiones de disaccordo e expression de solidaritate inter membros del communitate;
problemas de disveloppamento technic;
aspectos de contribution de contento;
casos de representar affiliatos/communitates a partners externe.

1 – Introduction

Le Codice Universal de Conducta forni un base de comportamento pro le collaboration in projectos Wikimedia a nivello mundial. Communitates pote adder a isto pro disveloppar politicas que prende in consideration le contexto local e cultural, ma debe mantener le criterios listate hic como standard minime.

Le Codice Universal de Conducta se applica equalmente a tote le Wikimedianos sin exception. Actiones que contradice le Codice Universal de Conducta pote resultar in sanctiones. Istes pote esser imponite per functionarios designate (como es appropriate in lor contexto local) e/o per le Fundation Wikimedia como le proprietario juridic del platteformas.

2 – Comportamento expectate

Omne Wikimediano, sia un redactor nove o experte, un functionario del communitate, o un membro o empleato de un affiliato o del consilio de administration del Fundation Wikimedia, es responsabile pro su proprie comportamento.

In omne projectos, spatios e eventos de Wikimedia, le comportamento debe fundar se in le respecto, le civilitate, le collegialitate, le solidaritate e le bon senso civic. Isto se applica a omne contributor e participante in su interaction con omne contributor e participante, sin expectationes basate sur etate, dishabilitates mental o physic, apparentia physic, origine national, religiose, ethnic e cultural, casta, classe social, fluentia linguistic, orientation sexual, identitate de genere, sexo o campo de carriera. Ni se face exceptiones basate sur position, habilitates o realisationes in le projectos o le movimento de Wikimedia.

2.1 – Respecto mutue

Nos expecta que tote le Wikimedianos monstra respecto pro alteres. In le communication con personas, in ambientes Wikimedia in linea assi como foras de linea, nos tractara le un le altere con respecto mutue.

Isto include, sin limitation, le sequente directivas:

Practica empathia. Ascolta e tenta comprender lo que Wikimedianos de differente origines vole dicer a te. Sia preste a confrontar e adaptar tu proprie comprehension, expectationes, e comportamento como un Wikimediano.
Suppone le bon fide, e ingagia in modificationes constructive; tu contributiones debe meliorar le qualitate del projecto o labor. Offere e recipe retroaction amabilemente e con bon fide. Criticas debe esser date de maniera sensibile e constructive. Tote le Wikimedianos debe supponer, a minus que existe evidentia contrari, que altere personas es presente pro meliorar le projectos de maniera collaborative. Nonobstante, isto non debe esser usate pro justificar declarationes con un impacto nocive.
Respecta le maniera in que le contributores se nomina e describe. Personas pote usar terminos specific pro describer se. Como signo de respecto, usa iste terminos quando tu communica con o sur iste personas, ubi lingual- o technicamente facibile. Exemplos include:
- Gruppos ethnic pote usar un nomine specific pro describer se, in loco del nomine historicamente usate per alteres;
- Personas pote haber nomines que usa litteras, sonos, o parolas de lor lingua que te pote esser incognite;
- Personas qui se identifica con un certe orientation sexual o identitate de genere pote usar nomines o pronomines distincte;
- Personas con un particular dishabilitate physic o mental pote usar terminos specific pro describer se.
Durante le reuniones in persona, nos dara le benvenita a omnes e nos prendera cura e respecto del preferentias, limites, sensibilitates, traditiones e requisitos de cata uno.

2.2 – Civilitate, collegialitate, supporto mutue e bon senso civic

We strive towards the following behaviours:

Civility is politeness in behaviour and speech amongst people, including strangers.
Collegiality is the friendly support that people engaged in a common effort extend to each other.
Mutual support and good citizenship means taking active responsibility for ensuring that the Wikimedia projects are productive, pleasant and safe spaces, and contribute to the Wikimedia mission.

This includes but is not limited to:

Mentorship and coaching: Helping newcomers to find their way and acquire essential skills.
Looking out for fellow contributors: Lend them a hand when they need support, and speak up for them when they are treated in a way that falls short of expected behaviour as per the Universal Code of Conduct.
Recognize and credit the work done by contributors: Thank them for their help and work. Appreciate their efforts and give credit where it is due.

3 – Unacceptable behaviour

The Universal Code of Conduct aims to help community members identify situations of bad behaviour. The following behaviours are considered unacceptable within the Wikimedia movement:

3.1 – Harassment

This includes any behaviour intended primarily to intimidate, outrage or upset a person, or any behaviour where this would reasonably be considered the most likely main outcome. Behaviour can be considered harassment if it is beyond what a reasonable person would be expected to tolerate in a global, intercultural environment. Harassment often takes the form of emotional abuse, especially towards people who are in a vulnerable position, and may include contacting workplaces or friends and family members in an effort to intimidate or embarrass. In some cases, behaviour that would not rise to the level of harassment in a single case can become harassment through repetition. Harassment includes but is not limited to:

Insults: This includes name calling, using slurs or stereotypes, and any attacks based on personal characteristics. Insults may refer to perceived characteristics like intelligence, appearance, ethnicity, race, religion (or lack thereof), culture, caste, sexual orientation, gender, sex, disability, age, nationality, political affiliation, or other characteristics. In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not.
Sexual harassment: Sexual attention or advances of any kind towards others where the person knows or reasonably should know that the attention is unwelcome or in situations where consent cannot be communicated.
Threats: Explicitly or implicitly suggesting the possibility of physical violence, unfair embarrassment, unfair and unjustified reputational harm, or intimidation by suggesting gratuitous legal action to win an argument or force someone to behave the way you want.
Encouraging harm to others: This includes encouraging someone else to commit self-harm or suicide as well as encouraging someone to conduct violent attacks on a third party.
Disclosure of personal data (Doxing): sharing other contributors' private information, such as name, place of employment, physical or email address without their explicit consent either on the Wikimedia projects or elsewhere, or sharing information concerning their Wikimedia activity outside the projects.
Hounding: following a person across the project(s) and repeatedly critiquing their work mainly with the intent to upset or discourage them. If problems are continuing after efforts to communicate and educate, communities may need to address them through established community processes.
Trolling: Deliberately disrupting conversations or posting in bad-faith to intentionally provoke.

3.2 – Abuse of power, privilege, or influence

Abuse occurs when someone in a real or perceived position of power, privilege, or influence engages in disrespectful, cruel, and/or violent behaviour towards other people. In Wikimedia environments, it may take the form of verbal or psychological abuse and may overlap with harassment.

Abuse of office by functionaries, officials and staff: use of authority, knowledge, or resources at the disposal of designated functionaries, as well as officials and staff of the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikimedia affiliates, to intimidate or threaten others.
Abuse of seniority and connections: Using one's position and reputation to intimidate others. We expect people with significant experience and connections in the movement to behave with special care because hostile comments from them may carry an unintended backlash. People with community authority have a particular privilege to be viewed as reliable and should not abuse this to attack others who disagree with them.
Psychological manipulation: Maliciously causing someone to doubt their own perceptions, senses, or understanding with the objective to win an argument or force someone to behave the way you want.

3.3 – Content vandalism and abuse of the projects

Deliberately introducing biased, false, inaccurate or inappropriate content, or hindering, impeding or otherwise hampering the creation (and/or maintenance) of content. This includes but is not limited to:

The repeated arbitrary or unmotivated removal of any content without appropriate discussion or providing explanation
Systematically manipulating content to favour specific interpretations of facts or points of view (also by means of unfaithful or deliberately false rendering of sources and altering the correct way of composing editorial content)
Hate speech in any form, or discriminatory language aimed at vilifying, humiliating, inciting hatred against individuals or groups on the basis of who they are or their personal beliefs
The use of symbols, images, categories, tags or other kinds of content that are intimidating or harmful to others outside of the context of encyclopedic, informational use. This includes imposing schemes on content intended to marginalize or ostracize.