Legal talk:Data retention guidelines: Difference between revisions
m Section 4 |
m +1 |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
''Information you provide us or information we collect from you that could be used to personally identify you.'' Reads a bit strange. Maybe a full sentence would be better here? Something like "Personal information means information you provide ..." maybe? --[[User:Thogo|თოგო]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Thogo|D]])</small></sup> 22:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
''Information you provide us or information we collect from you that could be used to personally identify you.'' Reads a bit strange. Maybe a full sentence would be better here? Something like "Personal information means information you provide ..." maybe? --[[User:Thogo|თოგო]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Thogo|D]])</small></sup> 22:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Possibilities in case of breaches == |
|||
Maybe the policy should contain information about a place where users can go if they feel that the policy was breached. --[[User:Thogo|თოგო]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Thogo|D]])</small></sup> 22:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:17, 9 January 2014
Gender?
The examples list "email and gender in account settings" as examples of non-public data; however the account settings 'gender' property is publicly disclosed by necessity due to its purpose in producing grammatically correct strings.
Is this meant only to treat the combination of the two as private? Otherwise, we're leaking gender-by-username... --brion (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Someone removed it, so ... :D --brion (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Michelle did, but her login is apparently still on vacation :) It was removed in response to this remark. —LVilla (WMF) (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Section 4 (Definition of personal information)
Information you provide us or information we collect from you that could be used to personally identify you. Reads a bit strange. Maybe a full sentence would be better here? Something like "Personal information means information you provide ..." maybe? --თოგო (D) 22:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Possibilities in case of breaches
Maybe the policy should contain information about a place where users can go if they feel that the policy was breached. --თოგო (D) 22:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)