Policy:Universal Code of Conduct/zh

維基媒體通用行為準則

為何我們需要《通用行為準則》

我們相信要允許盡可能多的人群主動參與維基媒體計畫及其空間，以期能實現我們對每個人都可以共享所有人類知識的世界的願景。我們相信我們的貢獻者社群應盡可能多樣化，具備包容性與親近感。我們希望這些社群能為加入（以及想要加入）的人們提供積極、安全與健康的環境。我們致力保護這個社羣的環境，因此才通過接受這份行為準則並按需進行更新。此外，我們希望能保護我們的計畫，免於那些破壞或扭曲內容者的侵害。

根據維基媒體的使命，所有從事維基媒體專案和空間的人會：

• 協助創造一個人人都可以自由共享所有知識的世界。
• 參與一個避免偏見和成見的全球社群，以及
• 在所有工作中力求準確性和可驗證性。

本通用行為準則（UCoC）定義了可接受和不可接受行為的基準。它適用於與在各個線上和線下維基媒體專案和空間中，進行交流並為之貢獻的每個人，包括新手的和資深貢獻者、專案工作人員、活動組織者和參與者、分支機構的員工和董／理事會成員，以及維基媒體基金會的員工和董事會成員。它適用於所有現場和虛擬活動、技術空間以及所有維基媒體專案和維基網站，以及下列類型活動）：

• 私人、公開和半公開的交流
• 討論社群成員之間的分歧和表達團結
• 技術發展問題
• 內容貢獻方面
• 代表分支機構／社群與外部合作夥伴合作的狀況

1—引言

《通用行為準則》為全世界的維基媒體項目中的協作提供了行為基準。社群可在本準則的基礎上，以本地與文化背景為考量，制訂政策。同時，社群要將本準則所列出評判標準視作最低標準。

《通用行為準則》適用於所有維基媒体人，不含例外。違反《準則》者可受制裁。制裁可能由本地管理层和/或基金会（作為站点的法律所有人）实施。

2—期望行為

無論是新手、資深編輯、社群工作人員、分支組織或維基媒體基金會的理事會成員或員工，每個維基媒體人都應對自己的行為負責。

在所有維基媒體專案、空間和活動中的行為，都將建立在尊重、文明、合作、團結和良好公民意識上。這適用於所有貢獻者和參與者彼此之間的所有互動，而不會根據年齡、精神或身體殘疾、體型外表、國籍、宗教、種族和文化背景或種姓、社會階層、語言流利性、性取向、性別認同或職業領域而給予差別對待。我們也不會根據在維基媒體專案或運動中的成就、技能或地位而給予特例。

2.1—互相尊重

我們期望所有維基媒體人都能對他人表示尊重。不論在維基媒體的線上還是線下環境，在與他人交流過程中，我們要以互相尊重的態度對待對方。

這包括但不限於：

• 有同理心。聆聽並試著理解任何維基媒体人的訴求。作為維基媒体人，要隨時準備挑戰和調整您自己的理解、期望和行為。
• 始終假定善意，並進行具建設性、積極性的編輯；友善而真誠地提供和接受反饋。批評應該恰如其分、並具有建設性，包括具體的、可衡量的改進策略。所有維基人都應該假定善意，除非另有證據表明其他人在這里合作改進項目，但這不應該被用來證明具有有害影響的陳述是合理的。
• 尊重貢獻者自稱和自述。人們可能會使用特定術語來形容自己。為表示尊重，請在與這些人交流或談論到他們時使用這些術語。例如：
  • 種族可能使用特定名稱來形容自己，而不是歷史上他人對他們的形容詞；
  • 有些人的名字可能用了他們的語言中特有的詞彙、字母或發音，與你熟知的不同；
  • 有些人可能會使用不同的名字或代詞，來表示某種性取向或性別認同；
  • People having a particular physical or mental disability may use particular terms to describe themselves
• During in-person meetings, we will be welcoming to everyone and we will be mindful and respectful of each others’ preferences, boundaries, sensibilities, traditions and requirements.

2.2 – Civility, collegiality, mutual support and good citizenship

We strive towards the following behaviours:

• Civility is politeness in behaviour and speech amongst people, including strangers.
• Collegiality is the friendly support that people engaged in a common effort extend to each other.
• Mutual support and good citizenship means taking active responsibility for ensuring that the Wikimedia projects are productive, pleasant and safe spaces, and contribute to the Wikimedia mission.

This includes but is not limited to:

• Mentorship and coaching: Helping newcomers to find their way and acquire essential skills.
• Looking out for fellow contributors: Lend them a hand when they need support, and speak up for them when they are treated in a way that falls short of expected behaviour as per the Universal Code of Conduct.
• Recognize and credit the work done by contributors: Thank them for their help and work. Appreciate their efforts and give credit where it is due.

3 – Unacceptable behaviour

The Universal Code of Conduct aims to help community members identify situations of bad behaviour. The following behaviours are considered unacceptable within the Wikimedia movement:

3.1 – Harassment

This includes any behaviour intended primarily to intimidate, outrage or upset a person, or any behaviour where this would reasonably be considered the most likely main outcome. Behaviour can be considered harassment if it is beyond what a reasonable person would be expected to tolerate in a global, intercultural environment. Harassment often takes the form of emotional abuse, especially towards people who are in a vulnerable position, and may include contacting workplaces or friends and family members in an effort to intimidate or embarrass. In some cases, behaviour that would not rise to the level of harassment in a single case can become harassment through repetition. Harassment includes but is not limited to:

• Insults: This includes name calling, using slurs or stereotypes, and any attacks based on personal characteristics. Insults may refer to perceived characteristics like intelligence, appearance, ethnicity, race, religion (or lack thereof), culture, caste, sexual orientation, gender, sex, disability, age, nationality, political affiliation, or other characteristics. In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not.
• Sexual harassment: Sexual attention or advances of any kind towards others where the person knows or reasonably should know that the attention is unwelcome or in situations where consent cannot be communicated.
• Threats: Explicitly or implicitly suggesting the possibility of physical violence, unfair embarrassment, unfair and unjustified reputational harm, or intimidation by suggesting gratuitous legal action to win an argument or force someone to behave the way you want.
• Encouraging harm to others: This includes encouraging someone else to commit self-harm or suicide as well as encouraging someone to conduct violent attacks on a third party.
• Disclosure of personal data (Doxing): sharing other contributors' private information, such as name, place of employment, physical or email address without their explicit consent either on the Wikimedia projects or elsewhere, or sharing information concerning their Wikimedia activity outside the projects.
• Hounding: following a person across the project(s) and repeatedly critiquing their work mainly with the intent to upset or discourage them. If problems are continuing after efforts to communicate and educate, communities may need to address them through established community processes.
• Trolling: Deliberately disrupting conversations or posting in bad-faith to intentionally provoke.

3.2 – Abuse of power, privilege, or influence

Abuse occurs when someone in a real or perceived position of power, privilege, or influence engages in disrespectful, cruel, and/or violent behaviour towards other people. In Wikimedia environments, it may take the form of verbal or psychological abuse and may overlap with harassment.

• Abuse of office by functionaries, officials and staff: use of authority, knowledge, or resources at the disposal of designated functionaries, as well as officials and staff of the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikimedia affiliates, to intimidate or threaten others.
• Abuse of seniority and connections: Using one's position and reputation to intimidate others. We expect people with significant experience and connections in the movement to behave with special care because hostile comments from them may carry an unintended backlash. People with community authority have a particular privilege to be viewed as reliable and should not abuse this to attack others who disagree with them.
• Psychological manipulation: Maliciously causing someone to doubt their own perceptions, senses, or understanding with the objective to win an argument or force someone to behave the way you want.

3.3 – Content vandalism and abuse of the projects

Deliberately introducing biased, false, inaccurate or inappropriate content, or hindering, impeding or otherwise hampering the creation (and/or maintenance) of content. This includes but is not limited to:

• The repeated arbitrary or unmotivated removal of any content without appropriate discussion or providing explanation
• Systematically manipulating content to favour specific interpretations of facts or points of view (also by means of unfaithful or deliberately false rendering of sources and altering the correct way of composing editorial content)
• Hate speech in any form, or discriminatory language aimed at vilifying, humiliating, inciting hatred against individuals or groups on the basis of who they are or their personal beliefs
• The use of symbols, images, categories, tags or other kinds of content that are intimidating or harmful to others outside of the context of encyclopedic, informational use. This includes imposing schemes on content intended to marginalize or ostracize.