Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 years ago by NNair (WMF)
Content deleted Content added
q |
NNair (WMF) (talk | contribs) Responding to a comment |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Ping|MarcoAurelio}}Thank you for your comment. Section 4 of Wikimedia Terms of Use does cover some behavioural guidelines along with content guidelines such as copyright infringement and paid contributions, however it is not a comprehensive list. It is very open to interpretation and not often applied as a guideline on wiki. The Universal Code of Conduct aims to help communities actually apply the section 4 of the Wikimedia Terms of Use by spelling out in more detail, what is covered by them and more focussed conduct guidelines. --[[User:NNair (WMF)|NNair (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NNair (WMF)|talk]]) 17:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
{{Ping|MarcoAurelio}}Thank you for your comment. Section 4 of Wikimedia Terms of Use does cover some behavioural guidelines along with content guidelines such as copyright infringement and paid contributions, however it is not a comprehensive list. It is very open to interpretation and not often applied as a guideline on wiki. The Universal Code of Conduct aims to help communities actually apply the section 4 of the Wikimedia Terms of Use by spelling out in more detail, what is covered by them and more focussed conduct guidelines. --[[User:NNair (WMF)|NNair (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NNair (WMF)|talk]]) 17:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
:Would it not be more efficient to rewrite Section 4 to be more of a "Projects should have rules that enforce [x], support [y], etc..."? [[User:Vermont|Vermont]] ([[User talk:Vermont|talk]]) 17:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
:Would it not be more efficient to rewrite Section 4 to be more of a "Projects should have rules that enforce [x], support [y], etc..."? [[User:Vermont|Vermont]] ([[User talk:Vermont|talk]]) 17:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{Ping|Vermont}} Hi Vermont, interesting point. Any changes to the TOU will have to be approved by the legal team, and we’ll be working with them as this process progresses. A difficulty there is that the section might get lengthy, as language could drift towards legalese. Having a readable and concise TOU is important, so it might be best that the TOU references the UCoC rather than having it live there in full. We’ll let them know about this suggestion, and get their opinions on it.--[[User:NNair (WMF)|NNair (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NNair (WMF)|talk]]) 06:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:02, 4 October 2019
How'd this not be redundant with Section 4 of the Terms of Use on refraining from certain activities (and behaviours)? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio:Thank you for your comment. Section 4 of Wikimedia Terms of Use does cover some behavioural guidelines along with content guidelines such as copyright infringement and paid contributions, however it is not a comprehensive list. It is very open to interpretation and not often applied as a guideline on wiki. The Universal Code of Conduct aims to help communities actually apply the section 4 of the Wikimedia Terms of Use by spelling out in more detail, what is covered by them and more focussed conduct guidelines. --NNair (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Would it not be more efficient to rewrite Section 4 to be more of a "Projects should have rules that enforce [x], support [y], etc..."? Vermont (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Vermont: Hi Vermont, interesting point. Any changes to the TOU will have to be approved by the legal team, and we’ll be working with them as this process progresses. A difficulty there is that the section might get lengthy, as language could drift towards legalese. Having a readable and concise TOU is important, so it might be best that the TOU references the UCoC rather than having it live there in full. We’ll let them know about this suggestion, and get their opinions on it.--NNair (WMF) (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)