Resolution:License update: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
+date
m →‎top: add resolution type
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
<languages />
Whereas the Board seeks to respond responsibly to longstanding community concerns about issues of compatibility between the [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License] and the [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ Creative Commons CC-BY-SA] license, as well as to continue longstanding traditions of strong community input and control over major decisions affecting the projects, and
{{resolution
|type = policies
|year = 2007
|status = passed
|title = <translate><!--T:1--> License update</translate>
|notes = <translate><!--T:2--> This resolution formally requesting that the GFDL be modified and that there will be a decision on relicensing was approved by vote (5 approvals, 1 missing) on 1 December 2007.</translate>
}}
<translate><!--T:3-->
Whereas the Board seeks to respond responsibly to longstanding community concerns about issues of compatibility between the [http:<tvar name="1">//www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html</tvar> GNU Free Documentation License] and the [http:<tvar name="2">//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us</tvar> Creative Commons CC-BY-SA] license, as well as to continue longstanding traditions of strong community input and control over major decisions affecting the projects, and
 
<!--T:4-->
Whereas a long period of discussion and negotiation between and amongst the Free Software Foundation, Creative Commons, the Wikimedia Foundation and others has produced a proposal supported by both the FSF and Creative Commons to modify the Free Documentation License in such a fashion as to allow the possibility for the Wikimedia Foundation to migrate the projects to CC-BY-SA, and
 
<!--T:5-->
Whereas, Creative Commons and the Free Software Foundation (FSF) would like formal support for this license change,</translate>
 
{{resolution|string=hereby}}
It is hereby resolved that:
 
<translate><!--T:7-->
* The Foundation requests that the [http:<tvar name="1">//www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html</tvar> GNU Free Documentation License] be modified in the fashion proposed by the FSF to allow migration by mass collaborative projects to the [http:<tvar name="2">//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us</tvar> Creative Commons CC-BY-SA] license;
* Upon the announcement of that relicensing, the Foundation will initiate a process of community discussion and voting before making a final decision on relicensing.
 
<!--T:8-->
5 approval (Jimmy, Florence, Jan-Bart, Erik, Frieda), 1 missing vote (Kat)</translate>
 
'''{{resolution|string=passed}}''' - {{dateT|month=12|day=1 |year=2007}}
'''Passed''', December 1, 2007.

Latest revision as of 02:50, 12 April 2024

Resolutions License update Feedback?
This resolution formally requesting that the GFDL be modified and that there will be a decision on relicensing was approved by vote (5 approvals, 1 missing) on 1 December 2007.

Whereas the Board seeks to respond responsibly to longstanding community concerns about issues of compatibility between the GNU Free Documentation License and the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license, as well as to continue longstanding traditions of strong community input and control over major decisions affecting the projects, and

Whereas a long period of discussion and negotiation between and amongst the Free Software Foundation, Creative Commons, the Wikimedia Foundation and others has produced a proposal supported by both the FSF and Creative Commons to modify the Free Documentation License in such a fashion as to allow the possibility for the Wikimedia Foundation to migrate the projects to CC-BY-SA, and

Whereas, Creative Commons and the Free Software Foundation (FSF) would like formal support for this license change,

It is hereby resolved that:

  • The Foundation requests that the GNU Free Documentation License be modified in the fashion proposed by the FSF to allow migration by mass collaborative projects to the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license;
  • Upon the announcement of that relicensing, the Foundation will initiate a process of community discussion and voting before making a final decision on relicensing.

5 approval (Jimmy, Florence, Jan-Bart, Erik, Frieda), 1 missing vote (Kat)

Passed - December 1, 2007