Resolution:Trustee terms and evaluation: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Sj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m interwiki
Line 4: Line 4:
}}
}}


The Board accepts the [[Minutes/July_8,_2010#Board_Governance_Committee_Report_and_Recommendations|Board Governance Committee's recommendation]] to extend the term of Board-appointed Trustees from one to two years, and directs the Governance Committee to develop a detailed set of recommendations around both balancing the term of appointed and community members and instituting a board member evaluation and replacement process as a successor to the prior [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nominating_committee Nomination Committee] process. The Board asks the Governance Committee to present these detailed recommendations by the end of the year.
The Board accepts the [[Minutes/July_8,_2010#Board_Governance_Committee_Report_and_Recommendations|Board Governance Committee's recommendation]] to extend the term of Board-appointed Trustees from one to two years, and directs the Governance Committee to develop a detailed set of recommendations around both balancing the term of appointed and community members and instituting a board member evaluation and replacement process as a successor to the prior [[m:Nominating committee|Nomination Committee]] process. The Board asks the Governance Committee to present these detailed recommendations by the end of the year.


: Passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals (by the appointed Trustees)
: Passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals (by the appointed Trustees)

Revision as of 07:50, 10 October 2010

Resolutions Trustee Terms and evaluation Feedback?
This resolution regarding Board-appointed Trustees and general Trustee evaluation passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals.

The Board accepts the Board Governance Committee's recommendation to extend the term of Board-appointed Trustees from one to two years, and directs the Governance Committee to develop a detailed set of recommendations around both balancing the term of appointed and community members and instituting a board member evaluation and replacement process as a successor to the prior Nomination Committee process. The Board asks the Governance Committee to present these detailed recommendations by the end of the year.

Passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals (by the appointed Trustees)