Resolution:Trustee terms and evaluation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m interwiki |
||
Line 4:
}}
The Board accepts the [[Minutes/July_8,_2010#Board_Governance_Committee_Report_and_Recommendations|Board Governance Committee's recommendation]] to extend the term of Board-appointed Trustees from one to two years, and directs the Governance Committee to develop a detailed set of recommendations around both balancing the term of appointed and community members and instituting a board member evaluation and replacement process as a successor to the prior [
: Passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals (by the appointed Trustees)
| |||
Revision as of 07:50, 10 October 2010
 | This proposal has been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. It may not be circumvented, eroded, or ignored by Wikimedia Foundation officers or staff nor local policies of any Wikimedia project. Please note that in the event of any differences in meaning or interpretation between the original English version of this content and a translation, the original English version takes precedence. |
| ←Resolutions | Trustee Terms and evaluation | Feedback?→ |
| This resolution regarding Board-appointed Trustees and general Trustee evaluation passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals. |
The Board accepts the Board Governance Committee's recommendation to extend the term of Board-appointed Trustees from one to two years, and directs the Governance Committee to develop a detailed set of recommendations around both balancing the term of appointed and community members and instituting a board member evaluation and replacement process as a successor to the prior Nomination Committee process. The Board asks the Governance Committee to present these detailed recommendations by the end of the year.
- Passed with 6 supports and 4 recusals (by the appointed Trustees)