User contributions for LuisV (WMF)
A user with 13 edits. Account created on 13 February 2013.
5 February 2014
- 01:0901:09, 5 February 2014 diff hist +409 Policy talk:Privacy policy →No official reply since December 7: - note that reply is posted below in new section and suggest responding there.
- 01:0801:08, 5 February 2014 diff hist +410 Policy talk:Privacy policy →Unsampled request logs/tracking: - note that there is a new discussion below. If there are unanswered questions from this section, please post them there so we can have the discussion in one place.
- 01:0601:06, 5 February 2014 diff hist +1,329 Policy talk:Privacy policy →Summaries making even longer?
- 01:0201:02, 5 February 2014 diff hist −92 m Policy talk:Privacy policy →Unsampled request logs/tracking: - mostly unindent (by ::::) this very long discussion to help with readability
- 00:2900:29, 5 February 2014 diff hist +771 Policy talk:Privacy policy →Electronic Frontier Foundation's Best Practices for Online Service Providers
- 00:2900:29, 5 February 2014 diff hist +322 Policy talk:Privacy policy →WMF Response to concerns about unsampled data: - add another note
- 00:1200:12, 5 February 2014 diff hist +1,224 Policy talk:Privacy policy →WMF Response to concerns about unsampled data: - add note about old policy and about tone/accusations in previous discussions of this topic
4 February 2014
- 20:0820:08, 4 February 2014 diff hist +218 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Non-personal information associated with a user account (server logs): - note about DNS
- 02:1602:16, 4 February 2014 diff hist +1,969 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Non-personal information associated with a user account (server logs): respond
- 01:1301:13, 4 February 2014 diff hist +819 Policy talk:Privacy policy Another labs term proposal - allowing particular communities to require opt-in.
- 00:4800:48, 4 February 2014 diff hist +207 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →How long do we retain non-public data?: - respond to email q; point to new response below
- 00:4700:47, 4 February 2014 diff hist +693 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Indefinite retention of emails: - reopening to propose answer
30 January 2014
- 18:3118:31, 30 January 2014 diff hist +552 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Design of new systems: - added reply; added new sub-heading to make more clear what they were a response to.
23 January 2014
- 01:4801:48, 23 January 2014 diff hist +19 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Examples in #How long do we retain non-public data?: - note that followups will be above in Shell's thread
- 01:3401:34, 23 January 2014 diff hist +418 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Indefinite retention of emails: - oops, my mistake
22 January 2014
- 20:5120:51, 22 January 2014 diff hist +527 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Is there any possibilities of reasonable IAR on this guideline?: - not for employees; hopefully not necessary for others.
- 20:2720:27, 22 January 2014 diff hist +234 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Who are "we"?: - add a further comment about CUs
- 20:2520:25, 22 January 2014 diff hist +580 Legal talk:Data retention guidelines →Who are "we"?: - note on applying this to third parties
14 January 2014
- 22:1322:13, 14 January 2014 diff hist −12 Legal:Data retention guidelines Sigh, English is hard.
- 22:1322:13, 14 January 2014 diff hist −23 Legal:Data retention guidelines Clarify slightly redundant information (aggregate/anonymize is breaking up the association with personal information, doesn't need to be twice in the sentence)