Talk:RFP/2013 Datacenter: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 years ago by KSnider (WMF) in topic Deadline
Content deleted Content added
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig |
|||
|archive = Talk:RFP/2013 Datacenter/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
|algo = old(180d) |
|||
|counter = 1 |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}} |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|||
}}{{archives}} |
|||
==Deadline== |
==Deadline== |
||
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:05, 14 October 2023
Archives
Deadline
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --Nemo 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- We're only looking for proposal intent here - not necessarily a finalized proposal, so the deadline isn't quite as short in that scenario. But yes, I believe three weeks is long enough to reach out to interested parties, and at least find out that they intend to participate. KSnider (WMF) (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)