User talk:AP295: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Ottawahitech in topic thank you
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Ottawahitech (talk | contribs) →thank you: Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: "''but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation.''" Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. ''Morally bankrupt'' is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. I suppose I should say ''something'' about it in the policy discussion though. A few editors in the RfC have dolled out the usual round of thought-terminating clichés. I don't mean to make it look like that's stopping me. Rather, I haven't the energy for it right at the moment. [[User:AP295|AP295]] ([[User talk:AP295|talk]]) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
: "''but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation.''" Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. ''Morally bankrupt'' is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. I suppose I should say ''something'' about it in the policy discussion though. A few editors in the RfC have dolled out the usual round of thought-terminating clichés. I don't mean to make it look like that's stopping me. Rather, I haven't the energy for it right at the moment. [[User:AP295|AP295]] ([[User talk:AP295|talk]]) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::re: "I haven't the energy for it right at the moment." |
|||
::Tell me about it! I am also going through something similar. I guess we all do. I miss your fiery attitude at wikiversity. Hope you recover soon. |
|||
::btw I did not see your response until now, even though I have been checking this page periodically. [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 15:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:12, 14 March 2024
thank you
Thanks for spotting META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- "but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation." Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. Morally bankrupt is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. I suppose I should say something about it in the policy discussion though. A few editors in the RfC have dolled out the usual round of thought-terminating clichés. I don't mean to make it look like that's stopping me. Rather, I haven't the energy for it right at the moment. AP295 (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- re: "I haven't the energy for it right at the moment."
- Tell me about it! I am also going through something similar. I guess we all do. I miss your fiery attitude at wikiversity. Hope you recover soon.
- btw I did not see your response until now, even though I have been checking this page periodically. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)