User talk:Alison Wheeler: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Why "Wikimedia UK" seems to be good unmentioned on Local chapters. |
+comment |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't know how things has changed since we had talked. I hope now you can say the WMF recognized Wikimedia UK with no problem, but I acted here and now assuming worse case. For further edit, please talk with Delphine. Thank you. --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 11:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
I don't know how things has changed since we had talked. I hope now you can say the WMF recognized Wikimedia UK with no problem, but I acted here and now assuming worse case. For further edit, please talk with Delphine. Thank you. --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 11:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
Good to see you active here. :-) --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 16:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:51, 18 September 2011
I removed your edit from Local chapters for the sake of notafish's opinion I have recently heard at m:User talk:Notafish or mine (perhaps now archived). As Local Chapter Chair, she is responsible of chapters recognition on the Wikimedia Foundation, and according to her nor UK and Netherland hadn't reached to the condition this page (=WMF) mentions to them officially.
I don't know how things has changed since we had talked. I hope now you can say the WMF recognized Wikimedia UK with no problem, but I acted here and now assuming worse case. For further edit, please talk with Delphine. Thank you. --Aphaea 11:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Good to see you active here. :-) --MZMcBride 16:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)