Legal:Visual identity guidelines: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Agreed on avoiding blue. Let's keep it black. Green wasn't correct.
m clean up using w:WP:AWB, typos fixed: ’s → 's (5), permissable → permissible
Line 22:
around the world by millions of people every day.
We created these guidelines to help authorized
re-users of the Wikimedia Foundation’sFoundation's official
marks, including Wikipedia, represent our identity
in a way that is consistent with the quality, impact,
Line 167:
The wordmark is the most desirable variant of the
official marks for clearly communicating the presence of
Wikipedia, whether through the indication of Wikipedia’sWikipedia's
actual content, the presence of Wikipedia volunteers and
supporters, or to indicate the participation or partnership
Line 574:
is not endorsed by or affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.” In rare
circumstances, the registration mark may be omitted
but only with the approval of the Foundation’sFoundation's legal
department.
 
Line 832:
 
<div class="visual-identity-guidelines__column--half visual-identity-guidelines__column--float-right">
For special situations, it is permissablepermissible to reverse the wordmark from 75% black.
</div>
</div>
Line 1,008:
emphasis’ should apply. Other official marks should
appear in the same proportion as the Wikimedia Foundation or
Wikipedia marks. When one organization’sorganization's marks
appear without color, then the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikipedia
marks should also not be in color.
 
In situations where re-users are indicating Wikimedia Foundation’sFoundation's
sponsorship of a project, and/or a grant or funding,
only the Wikimedia Foundation mark should be

Revision as of 10:06, 16 October 2023