Legal talk:Data retention guidelines: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Brion VIBBER in topic Gender?
Content deleted Content added
navbox |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is this meant only to treat the combination of the two as private? Otherwise, we're leaking gender-by-username... --[[User:Brion VIBBER|brion]] ([[User talk:Brion VIBBER|talk]]) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
Is this meant only to treat the combination of the two as private? Otherwise, we're leaking gender-by-username... --[[User:Brion VIBBER|brion]] ([[User talk:Brion VIBBER|talk]]) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Someone removed it, so ... :D --[[User:Brion VIBBER|brion]] ([[User talk:Brion VIBBER|talk]]) 21:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:41, 9 January 2014
Gender?
The examples list "email and gender in account settings" as examples of non-public data; however the account settings 'gender' property is publicly disclosed by necessity due to its purpose in producing grammatically correct strings.
Is this meant only to treat the combination of the two as private? Otherwise, we're leaking gender-by-username... --brion (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Someone removed it, so ... :D --brion (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)