Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:14, 4 September 2013

Policy talk:Privacy policy/Header User:MiszaBot/config

Illustrations

There are obviously a lot of things to talk about and if you aren't interested in this piece of it please feel free to start a new section with your discussion point/question/concern/etc. As you can probably see both here and on some of the other policies and draft pages we rolled out we're trying the idea of having illustrations and minor jokes in the text. These are not in anyway 'set' and if they aren't liked are not obligated to appear in the final version. Legal documents in general are well known to be incredibly lengthy, weighty and difficult to read (and rarely read) especially when you consider how many sites the average user visits. We want to make these documents as accessible as possible to as many people as possible and the illustrations are meant to help that by illustrating the topics and keeping a bit of levity in the process to keep their attention. This is especially the case in the privacy policy but we've seeded them in a couple other locations as well. Do you like them? Hate them? Any specific ones work well or not work well? Should we think about another scene for a specific area? Jalexander (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 __TOC__
 ===Illustrations ===
-There are obviously a lot of things to talk about and if you aren't interested in this piece of it please feel free to start a new section with your discussion point/question/concern/etc but I wanted to start this off so that we had something up on top and a place to talk about it because I think there will be opinions. As you can probably see both here and on some of the other policies and draft pages we rolled out we're trying the idea of having illustrations and minor jokes in the text. These are not in anyway 'set' and if they aren't liked are not obligated to appear in the final version. Legal documents in general are well known to be incredibly lengthy, weighty and difficult to read. We want to make these documents as accessible as possible to as many people as possible and the illustrations are meant to help that by illustrating the topics and keeping a bit of levity in the process to keep your attention (This is especially the case in the privacy policy but we've seeded them in a couple other locations as well).  Do you like them? Hate them? Any specific ones work well or not work well?  Should we think about another scene for a specific area? [[User:Jalexander|Jalexander]] ([[User talk:Jalexander|talk]]) 01:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
+There are obviously a lot of things to talk about and if you aren't interested in this piece of it please feel free to start a new section with your discussion point/question/concern/etc.  As you can probably see both here and on some of the other policies and draft pages we rolled out we're trying the idea of having illustrations and minor jokes in the text. These are not in anyway 'set' and if they aren't liked are not obligated to appear in the final version. Legal documents in general are well known to be incredibly lengthy, weighty and difficult to read (and rarely read) especially when you consider how many sites the average user visits. We want to make these documents as accessible as possible to as many people as possible and the illustrations are meant to help that by illustrating the topics and keeping a bit of levity in the process to keep their attention. This is especially the case in the privacy policy but we've seeded them in a couple other locations as well.  Do you like them? Hate them? Any specific ones work well or not work well?  Should we think about another scene for a specific area? [[User:Jalexander|Jalexander]] ([[User talk:Jalexander|talk]]) 01:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)