Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bawolff in topic IP-adress
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Reverted changes by 111.84.192.75 (talk) to last version by Glaisher |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|algo = old(180d) |
|algo = old(180d) |
||
|archive = Talk:Privacy policy/Archives/%(year)d |
|archive = Talk:Privacy policy/Archives/%(year)d |
||
}} |
|||
}}ေေ္ူူသ႔ဆ၈၉ဘ |
|||
== conspiracy to another == |
== conspiracy to another == |
||
Revision as of 03:51, 19 July 2016
Template:Privacy policy talk header User:MiszaBot/config
conspiracy to another
when conspiraring against another will get 30 years behind bars. and when ones constition rights have been violated or controlled the fed should now intervien and take action and track eack person down and prosecute them my computer will be turned into the feds and they can track what others have done
IP-adress
The phrase of the privacy policy with IP-adresses "unique number" should be revised, because there is the IPv6 protocol. An IPv6-adress doesn't contain only numbers, but letters from a-f too (hexadecimal). --MrComment4 (talk) 18:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Arguably, a base-16 number is still a number, its just a different way of representing it (From a computer perspective, its just a bunch of 1's and 0's. an IPv4 address is 32 1's and 0's, and IPv6 is 128. People use the a-f for IPv6 because otherwise addresses will be really long). Bawolff (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)