Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:54, 11 September 2022

Scope

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The UCoC has a role as an optional fallback for those projects which don't have their own standards. Attempting to impose it on large, established communities such as English Wikipedia against consensus is just another power grab which will drive away editors. Certes (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Agree, UCoC should not apply on enwik, as enwiki can handle itself. Rockstone35 (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Revision as of 10:26, 11 September 2022 view source Certes (talk \| contribs) 0 edits →‎Scope: new section		Revision as of 10:54, 11 September 2022 view source Rockstone35 (talk \| contribs) 0 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The UCoC has a role as an optional fallback for those projects which don't have their own standards. Attempting to impose it on large, established communities such as English Wikipedia against consensus is just another power grab which will drive away editors. [[User:Certes\|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes\|talk]]) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)		The UCoC has a role as an optional fallback for those projects which don't have their own standards. Attempting to impose it on large, established communities such as English Wikipedia against consensus is just another power grab which will drive away editors. [[User:Certes\|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes\|talk]]) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

			Agree, UCoC should not apply on enwik, as enwiki can handle itself. [[User:Rockstone35\|Rockstone35]] ([[User talk:Rockstone35\|talk]]) 10:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)