Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines: Difference between revisions
Rockstone35 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Enforcement by type of violations: new section |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Agree, UCoC should not apply on enwik, as enwiki can handle itself. [[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] ([[User talk:Rockstone35|talk]]) 10:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
Agree, UCoC should not apply on enwik, as enwiki can handle itself. [[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] ([[User talk:Rockstone35|talk]]) 10:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Enforcement by type of violations == |
|||
There is nothing directly specifying UCoC violations by WMF staff & contractors, BOT, Working Groups or Committees. While its highly unlikely that people in some of the roles would cause an issue, its only fair that there be some recourse mentioned in this section for those areas. Aka Affcom oversees affiliates but who oversees Affcom, what if the Language committee denies a language because of racism, or a funding committee denies a community/individual without cause or places impractical conditions on a grant forcing it to be withdrawn/denied ? The current layout appears to create a set of untouchables in the movement. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnangarra]] ([[User talk:Gnangarra|talk]]) 12:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:27, 11 September 2022
Scope
The UCoC has a role as an optional fallback for those projects which don't have their own standards. Attempting to impose it on large, established communities such as English Wikipedia against consensus is just another power grab which will drive away editors. Certes (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Agree, UCoC should not apply on enwik, as enwiki can handle itself. Rockstone35 (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Enforcement by type of violations
There is nothing directly specifying UCoC violations by WMF staff & contractors, BOT, Working Groups or Committees. While its highly unlikely that people in some of the roles would cause an issue, its only fair that there be some recourse mentioned in this section for those areas. Aka Affcom oversees affiliates but who oversees Affcom, what if the Language committee denies a language because of racism, or a funding committee denies a community/individual without cause or places impractical conditions on a grant forcing it to be withdrawn/denied ? The current layout appears to create a set of untouchables in the movement. Gnangarra (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)