Agenda talk:2016-09-19: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "==Harassment== Considering the biggest harasser of Wikimedia users is the WMF, I hope useful and concrete matters such as Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard#Proposed res..."
 
m →‎Harassment: Nemo_bis
Line 1: Line 1:
==Harassment==
==Harassment==
Considering the biggest harasser of Wikimedia users is the WMF, I hope useful and concrete matters such as [[Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard#Proposed resolution on user rights process]] will be on the table. [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 06:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Considering the biggest harasser of Wikimedia users is the WMF, I hope useful and concrete matters such as [[Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard#Proposed resolution on user rights process]] will be on the table. [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 06:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Nemo_bis}} thank you for reminding me about this question on the Board noticeboard. I have inquired whether [[User:Jan-Bart|Jan-Bart]] had brought this proposal to the attention of the Board, as he promised. And yes, it seems that the issue was discussed with the Board and it was decided that legal would take a look at it. I haven't contacted the legal team yet, I have only asked if [[User:Slaporte (WMF)|Slaporte (WMF)]] has any info about it. And he doesn't.

:Unfortunately, we (as the Board) shall not have enough time for discussing this matter during our meeting on Monday, the time is really limited. I would love to discuss it more with you over the course of the next weeks, after this Board meeting, to understand the situation better. Will it work for you? --[[User:NTymkiv (WMF)|NTymkiv (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NTymkiv (WMF)|talk]]) 02:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:36, 17 September 2016

Harassment

Considering the biggest harasser of Wikimedia users is the WMF, I hope useful and concrete matters such as Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard#Proposed resolution on user rights process will be on the table. Nemo 06:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemo bis: thank you for reminding me about this question on the Board noticeboard. I have inquired whether Jan-Bart had brought this proposal to the attention of the Board, as he promised. And yes, it seems that the issue was discussed with the Board and it was decided that legal would take a look at it. I haven't contacted the legal team yet, I have only asked if Slaporte (WMF) has any info about it. And he doesn't.
Unfortunately, we (as the Board) shall not have enough time for discussing this matter during our meeting on Monday, the time is really limited. I would love to discuss it more with you over the course of the next weeks, after this Board meeting, to understand the situation better. Will it work for you? --NTymkiv (WMF) (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]