Home: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Aphaia (talk | contribs)
replace dwool address wth a link to contact us,
Anthere (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
resources with neighbours near and far.<small> [[4 wishes for year 2007|Read more]]</small>
resources with neighbours near and far.<small> [[4 wishes for year 2007|Read more]]</small>


==Update of Foundation organization==
==Did you know ...==


''March 03''
... what '''[[Our projects#Wikisource|Wikisource]]''' is ? Really is ?


I thought it would be nice to offer a little update with regards to the organisation, in particular from a "person" perspective.
''Article by Danny Wool, then staff of the Wikimedia Foundation''


I outlined the various areas of activities of the Foundation, to try to identify in which areas we were staffed and in which areas we were either understaffed or not staffed at all. By staff, I do not necessarily mean "employee" as it may be volunteers from the community, interns, pro-bono help, contractors etc...
I thought it would be a good idea to share some news about another project, the English Wikisource, which has been doing some remarkable work in the past few months, thanks to a small group of dedicated editors and contributors.


But the fact is, when an area is under-staffed, the job either is not done at all, or poorly done by other staff members (on top of their regular activity), or poorly done by board members (who can not take
First for some background: Wikisource is much more than a library of old and PD texts. It can, and should, operate in tandem with the other projects, by providing the background to the information we offer.
care of what they should take care of). These under staffed areas or not staffed areas should be a focus of attention.


When I accepted to become chair of the board, I indicated that one of my priorities would be to work on the organization of the Foundation. I renewed that wish early 2007, making it a top priority along with
''See [[Danny Wool on Wikisource]].''
"quality", "recognition as a charity" and "outreach".
<!--


I also wanted to give you a feedback on what has been achieved in terms of organization since then, and what is currently still not satisfactory.
==Feature==
== Stable versions ==
The Wikimedia Foundation has developed a process to create "stable versions" of articles in its projects. Wikipedia will be initially testing this process in the German Wikipedia encyclopedia, a trial that will be evaluated, and potentially implemented on all languages, in all Wikimedia projects.


:[[Stable versions FAQ/English|English-language FAQ]] | [[Stable versions FAQ/Deutsch|German-language FAQ]]
-->


==Support us==
==Support us==

Revision as of 00:38, 1 May 2007

Template:HomeLang

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
And we need your help. Please support the Wikimedia Foundation by donating today.

4 wishes for year 2007

Wikimedia Chair Florence Nibart-Devouard's 4 wishes for year 2007
Yet another year is over. We’ll soon celebrate our 6 years of existence. Wikipedia has made an amazing transformation, growing from a grassroots effort to a global resource. A unique community-driven, non-commercial top 10 website, letting people share their knowledge, culture and resources with neighbours near and far. Read more

Update of Foundation organization

March 03

I thought it would be nice to offer a little update with regards to the organisation, in particular from a "person" perspective.

I outlined the various areas of activities of the Foundation, to try to identify in which areas we were staffed and in which areas we were either understaffed or not staffed at all. By staff, I do not necessarily mean "employee" as it may be volunteers from the community, interns, pro-bono help, contractors etc...

But the fact is, when an area is under-staffed, the job either is not done at all, or poorly done by other staff members (on top of their regular activity), or poorly done by board members (who can not take care of what they should take care of). These under staffed areas or not staffed areas should be a focus of attention.

When I accepted to become chair of the board, I indicated that one of my priorities would be to work on the organization of the Foundation. I renewed that wish early 2007, making it a top priority along with "quality", "recognition as a charity" and "outreach".

I also wanted to give you a feedback on what has been achieved in terms of organization since then, and what is currently still not satisfactory.


Support us

The Foundation mostly relies on support from individuals. Please consider making a donation today, be it time, money or hardware. The Benefactors page is dedicated to some of the companies and individuals helping to sustain the Wikimedia projects. The Wikimedia Foundation does not necessarily endorse the activities of its Corporate Benefactors.

The Wikimedia Foundation has 501(c)(3) tax exempt status in the United States. Donations made from other nations may also be tax deductible. See deductibility of donations for details. Please see our fundraising page for details of making donations via PayPal, MoneyBookers, postal mail or direct deposit. For all other types of donations, please contact us.

Corporate details

The Wikimedia Board of Trustees is the ultimate corporate authority in the Wikimedia Foundation Inc., and has the power to direct the activities of the Foundation. The Foundation bylaws may be seen at Wikimedia Foundation bylaws. Other policies set by the Board may be seen at policies.

The Foundation manages the Budget, which pays primarily for computer equipment and hosting. Other costs include human resources necessary to the running of the Wikimedia projects, though most people are volunteers. This site includes a list of notes from Board meetings .

The latest Board decisions may be found at resolutions.

Latest news

Template:News-en See also current events for more information.


Privacy policy: If you browse the Wikimedia project websites, we gather no more information than is typically collected in server logs. If you contribute to the Wikimedia projects, you are publishing every word you post publicly. You should assume that anything you write will be retained forever. This includes articles, user pages, talk pages and other pages on the websites.