Legal talk:Notices received from search engines: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
→‎Hungarian WP: new section
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig |archive = Legal talk:Notices received from search engines/Archive %(counter)d |algo = old(180d) |counter = 1 |maxarchivesize = 150K |archiveheader = {{talk archive}} |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadsleft = 3 }}{{talk header}}
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig
|archive = Legal talk:Notices received from search engines/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(180d)
|counter = 1
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
}}{{talk header}}

== Text ==
== Text ==
Is there any reason there are only images, no HTML or text version? [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 22:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Is there any reason there are only images, no HTML or text version? [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 22:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Line 5: Line 15:


Hungarian WP is listed in [[#Projects affected, number of notices received, and number of links removed]] but the notice is not available. Is that a mistake or is it intentionally non-public? --[[User:Tgr (WMF)|Tgr (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Tgr (WMF)|talk]]) 05:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hungarian WP is listed in [[#Projects affected, number of notices received, and number of links removed]] but the notice is not available. Is that a mistake or is it intentionally non-public? --[[User:Tgr (WMF)|Tgr (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Tgr (WMF)|talk]]) 05:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
:Now, there is an [[:File:Hg1RTBF.pdf|image]], but the image shows a notice for a page on the Occitan Wikipedia, not the Hungarian Wikipedia. [[User:Samat|Samat]] ([[User talk:Samat|talk]]) 09:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

== This page hasn't been updated in three years ==

Why have the Wikimedia Foundation stopped updating this page, has their position changed on content removal notices? The latest Wikimedia Transparency Report from [https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/transparency/2021-2/ late 2021] (there were none in 2022) included the passage linking here "We have a dedicated page where we post notices of delisted project pages that we have received from the search engines who provide such information as part of their own commitments to transparency." However, the latest information displayed on the page is from the second half of 2019, not 2021 let alone 2022. Has Wikimedia received no requests in the last three years or is it not willing to publish them anymore, and why were there no Transparency Reports last year? --[[User:Voello|Voello]] ([[User talk:Voello|talk]]) 02:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:14, 16 March 2024

Text

Is there any reason there are only images, no HTML or text version? PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian WP

Hungarian WP is listed in #Projects affected, number of notices received, and number of links removed but the notice is not available. Is that a mistake or is it intentionally non-public? --Tgr (WMF) (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now, there is an image, but the image shows a notice for a page on the Occitan Wikipedia, not the Hungarian Wikipedia. Samat (talk) 09:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page hasn't been updated in three years

Why have the Wikimedia Foundation stopped updating this page, has their position changed on content removal notices? The latest Wikimedia Transparency Report from late 2021 (there were none in 2022) included the passage linking here "We have a dedicated page where we post notices of delisted project pages that we have received from the search engines who provide such information as part of their own commitments to transparency." However, the latest information displayed on the page is from the second half of 2019, not 2021 let alone 2022. Has Wikimedia received no requests in the last three years or is it not willing to publish them anymore, and why were there no Transparency Reports last year? --Voello (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]