MediaWiki talk:Monobook.css: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cbrown1023 in topic Hiding the "log in" link
Content deleted Content added
New page: == Hiding the "log in" link == I think that it's safe to assume that editors here know how to log in without the aid of a "log in" link at the top. I think that it would make the site look...
 
Cbrown1023 (talk | contribs)
re
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hiding the "log in" link ==
== Hiding the "log in" link ==
I think that it's safe to assume that editors here know how to log in without the aid of a "log in" link at the top. I think that it would make the site look a lot cleaner if we CSS-ed out the login link. This can be done, and still allow logged in users to keep the user tools. [[User:Thunderhead|Thunderhead]] 04:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I think that it's safe to assume that editors here know how to log in without the aid of a "log in" link at the top. I think that it would make the site look a lot cleaner if we CSS-ed out the login link. This can be done, and still allow logged in users to keep the user tools. [[User:Thunderhead|Thunderhead]] 04:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
:It might look prettier, but don't "assume that editors here" will know. We have new staff members who barely know how to edit (and we might have some board members of the same type soon), so let's not assume that and make things harder for them. :-) '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 20:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:37, 8 September 2008

Hiding the "log in" link

I think that it's safe to assume that editors here know how to log in without the aid of a "log in" link at the top. I think that it would make the site look a lot cleaner if we CSS-ed out the login link. This can be done, and still allow logged in users to keep the user tools. Thunderhead 04:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It might look prettier, but don't "assume that editors here" will know. We have new staff members who barely know how to edit (and we might have some board members of the same type soon), so let's not assume that and make things harder for them. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 20:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply