Policy talk:Fundraising principles: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Sj (talk | contribs)
comments from Liam, moved from wm-l
 
Sj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
: we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia
: we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia


:: I don't know the answers to these specific cases, nor how long it takes to implement changes. These issues do get regular consideration; I was glad to see a number of new ways to donate implemented in the past year, regionally and globally. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small></span>
:: I don't know the answers to these specific cases, nor how long it takes to implement changes. These issues do get regular consideration; I was glad to see a number of new ways to donate implemented in the past year, regionally and globally. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small></span> 04:23, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:23, 4 December 2014

Wittylama had a few comments about fundraising principles, particularly as applied to the annual coordinated banner campaign. Reposted here:

  • "easily dismissible on mobile" (...the impossibly-small "x" icon to dismiss...)
I also find it hard to use the "X" icons we have for dismissing interfaces and overlays: both these banners and elsewhere.
  • "Tell the OTRS team and appropriate Chapter (when applicable) when any major change (such as adding/removing a new payment method) happens in that language/country.
A "pull" solution might be simpler here: a page that lists all such updates, so that people can go and find the information when they need it. SJ talk 
  • "Maximal Participation: ...we should empower individuals and groups world-wide to constructively contribute to direct messaging."
rather than being ambassadors for our mission, wikimedians are feeling increasingly embarrassed
I can't speak to how different people feel, but I think having a network of tens of thousands of ambassadors is a great strength, and something we should be working through for every messaging campaign, fundraising or otherwise. SJ talk 
  • "Minimal disruption: ...causing minimal disruption and annoyance for users of the projects"
Instead, a desire to finish fundraising quickly is given higher priority.
As you say, "less disruption" != "shorter". I wonder what the fundraising team's internal measures of disruption/annoyance are: I know they are aiming for low disruption, not just short duration. For example, we now have a larger proportion of fundraising done continuously throughout the year in part because that is less disruptive.
I would be glad to see a longer campaign with better side effects. For instance, a campaign that leaves everyone who sees it feeling more inspired and enthusiastic, motivated to recruit others to get involved, rather than annoyed or guilty or concerned. I don't know how possible this is, but it's worth trying and striving for. SJ talk 
  • "Internationalism: ...our fundraising practices must support the easiest possible transfer of money internationally."
we've had the recent discussions about how donating is difficult from the Netherlands and impossible from Russia
I don't know the answers to these specific cases, nor how long it takes to implement changes. These issues do get regular consideration; I was glad to see a number of new ways to donate implemented in the past year, regionally and globally. SJ talk  04:23, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]