Policy talk:Human Rights Policy/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 2 years ago by GVarnum-WMF in topic Mirror to Meta?
Content deleted Content added
Sj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
:Hey {{ping|Sj}} sorry - meant to post these edits from my staff account vs. volunteer. But on holiday leave - so was logged into volunteer account. Although either way for this particular edit... Anyway, to respond to your question. I am curious what your thoughts are on advantages of mirrored policies. My understanding is the origin of that is primarily related to restrictions placed on what was at that time Foundation Wiki. We have recently expanded capabilities on [[Governance Wiki]] (formerly Foundation Wiki) to greater facilitate community interaction (specificially allowing for translations and use of talk/user pages by SUL accounts) and reduce need for duplication. However, there may be advantages to duplication that has just not come up yet, so curious what you see as advantages as someone with more historical knowledge. Our desire has been to reduce the need for duplication as it has caused problems over the years, but I recognize there may be issues which have simply not come up in regards to housing them primarily on one wiki. --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 07:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
:Hey {{ping|Sj}} sorry - meant to post these edits from my staff account vs. volunteer. But on holiday leave - so was logged into volunteer account. Although either way for this particular edit... Anyway, to respond to your question. I am curious what your thoughts are on advantages of mirrored policies. My understanding is the origin of that is primarily related to restrictions placed on what was at that time Foundation Wiki. We have recently expanded capabilities on [[Governance Wiki]] (formerly Foundation Wiki) to greater facilitate community interaction (specificially allowing for translations and use of talk/user pages by SUL accounts) and reduce need for duplication. However, there may be advantages to duplication that has just not come up yet, so curious what you see as advantages as someone with more historical knowledge. Our desire has been to reduce the need for duplication as it has caused problems over the years, but I recognize there may be issues which have simply not come up in regards to housing them primarily on one wiki. --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 07:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
:: :) Both seem fine. It's good to have just a single set of talk pages and just one place to work on translations. But perhaps also worth doing something for WMF policies that scales well to those from other parts of the movement -- say having a complete category here of [[category:policies|policies]] whose pages may be protected mirrors from a 'wiki of origin', w/ talk pages redirecting to that wiki. &ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small> 03:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
:: :) Both seem fine. It's good to have just a single set of talk pages and just one place to work on translations. But perhaps also worth doing something for WMF policies that scales well to those from other parts of the movement -- say having a complete category here of [[category:policies|policies]] whose pages may be protected mirrors from a 'wiki of origin', w/ talk pages redirecting to that wiki. &ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small> 03:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
:::Ah - I think I see what you mean. So some sort of technical method we could use to "mirror" content (maybe translated if available) from central wikis (or one central wiki) and a notice stating the wiki of origin (similar to Global Userpages) and then talk page automatically redirect users to the originating central wiki's talk page for that content. I wonder if this idea, Phab ticket, or extension already exists somewhere. I do not think without several middle and duplicate maintenance steps this is currently possible - but I think the setup we are building on Governance Wiki could adapt to support this rather easily if it is technically doable (which - parts of it seem like they should be - but - that's usually the statement right before we learn it's insanely complicated). Does that sound like an accurate summary and roadmap reaction? Are you aware of anything similar to this out in the wild right now? I think we sort of came close to that with the previous setups - but the need for duplicate maintenance created problems over time. - [[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) &#91;he/him&#93;]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 20:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 4 January 2022

Mirror to Meta?

Hi @Varnent:, are you hoping to have all future policies on f.w.o only? It would be nice to maintain a full set of mirrored policies, like the Privacy and CoC pages. –SJ talk  05:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey @Sj: sorry - meant to post these edits from my staff account vs. volunteer. But on holiday leave - so was logged into volunteer account. Although either way for this particular edit... Anyway, to respond to your question. I am curious what your thoughts are on advantages of mirrored policies. My understanding is the origin of that is primarily related to restrictions placed on what was at that time Foundation Wiki. We have recently expanded capabilities on Governance Wiki (formerly Foundation Wiki) to greater facilitate community interaction (specificially allowing for translations and use of talk/user pages by SUL accounts) and reduce need for duplication. However, there may be advantages to duplication that has just not come up yet, so curious what you see as advantages as someone with more historical knowledge. Our desire has been to reduce the need for duplication as it has caused problems over the years, but I recognize there may be issues which have simply not come up in regards to housing them primarily on one wiki. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 07:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
:) Both seem fine. It's good to have just a single set of talk pages and just one place to work on translations. But perhaps also worth doing something for WMF policies that scales well to those from other parts of the movement -- say having a complete category here of whose pages may be protected mirrors from a 'wiki of origin', w/ talk pages redirecting to that wiki. –SJ talk  03:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Ah - I think I see what you mean. So some sort of technical method we could use to "mirror" content (maybe translated if available) from central wikis (or one central wiki) and a notice stating the wiki of origin (similar to Global Userpages) and then talk page automatically redirect users to the originating central wiki's talk page for that content. I wonder if this idea, Phab ticket, or extension already exists somewhere. I do not think without several middle and duplicate maintenance steps this is currently possible - but I think the setup we are building on Governance Wiki could adapt to support this rather easily if it is technically doable (which - parts of it seem like they should be - but - that's usually the statement right before we learn it's insanely complicated). Does that sound like an accurate summary and roadmap reaction? Are you aware of anything similar to this out in the wild right now? I think we sort of came close to that with the previous setups - but the need for duplicate maintenance created problems over time. - Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 20:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)