Policy talk:Privacy policy

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Revision as of 08:08, 6 March 2016 by Nemo bis (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 15415044 by Raghu Kalal (talk))

Template:Privacy policy talk header User:MiszaBot/config

conspiracy to another

when conspiraring against another will get 30 years behind bars. and when ones constition rights have been violated or controlled the fed should now intervien and take action and track eack person down and prosecute them my computer will be turned into the feds and they can track what others have done

third party cookies

The policy states We will never use third-party cookies, unless we get your permission to do so. Where it uses third-party cookies to mean cookies from domains not under control of the WMF. However, wikipedia defines the term as "Third-party cookies, however, belong to domains different from the one shown in the address bar", which is something we do use. I think that line in the privacy policy should be clarified. Bawolff (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly add Sindhi

I have translated Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy in Sindhi ) into Sindhi , So Kindly add it (here) for viewer-ship to Sindhi language Speakers,readers of Wikipedia.--Jogi don (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

better mobile

The IP Addresses section says: «We use IP addresses (…) and to provide better mobile and other applications.» What's the mobile you want to provide? It looks like something was missing. Platonides (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blog and Wordpress

More on what this Privacy Policy doesn’t cover, Third parties says «For example, our actions regarding your information on our blog are covered by this Privacy Policy, but if our blog were hosted by WordPress, WordPress may also collect…» The problem is, the foundation blog is hosted by Wordpress. So it ends up being misleading and confusing. Platonides (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP-adress

The phrase of the privacy policy with IP-adresses "unique number" should be revised, because there is the IPv6 protocol. An IPv6-adress doesn't contain only numbers, but letters from a-f too (hexadecimal). --MrComment4 (talk) 18:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably, a base-16 number is still a number, its just a different way of representing it (From a computer perspective, its just a bunch of 1's and 0's. an IPv4 address is 32 1's and 0's, and IPv6 is 128. People use the a-f for IPv6 because otherwise addresses will be really long). Bawolff (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]