Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
SpBot (talk | contribs)
m archiving 1 section from Talk:Universal Code of Conduct
SpBot (talk | contribs)
m archiving 1 section from Talk:Universal Code of Conduct
Line 12: Line 12:


Lets throw away safety and inclusion together with divercity and transgenderism from Wiki and concentrate on writing Enciclopedia, not left ideas--[[User:1Goldberg2|1Goldberg2]] ([[User talk:1Goldberg2|talk]]) 16:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Lets throw away safety and inclusion together with divercity and transgenderism from Wiki and concentrate on writing Enciclopedia, not left ideas--[[User:1Goldberg2|1Goldberg2]] ([[User talk:1Goldberg2|talk]]) 16:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

== Hate speech clause ==

In Section 3.3, third bullet, I would suggest to replace "Hate speech in any form, or discriminatory" with "Any deliberate use of".

Reason: A term like "Hate speech" already carries deeply ingrained definitions which may differ from the one intended here. The rest of the bullet point ("language aimed at...") gives an excellent definition of the prohibited behavior, so it is best to shift the focus to that definition.

[[User:Eldar|Eldar]] ([[User talk:Eldar|talk]]) 01:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:That makes sense. [[User:Eissink|Eissink]] ([[User talk:Eissink|talk]]) 07:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC).

:Thank you both for your comments about s3.3 of current [[Universal Code of Conduct/Policy text|Policy text]]: I have included the suggested change for consideration. [[User:Xeno (WMF)|Xeno (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Xeno (WMF)|talk]]) 16:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 6 May 2021

Structure

The balance between positive behaviours to strive for and negative behaviours that will not be tolerated is a good way to structure these things from what I've seen. The CoC that a user group I'm involved with followsa similar organisation v:WikiJournal_User_Group/Code_of_conduct/Draft. In case it's useful, there's also a section at the bottom of that page with some other useful inspirations. Some possible things to consider including:

  • Have examples in collapsed sections for each item (currently included for 'Respect the way that contributors name and describe themselves')
    • Indeed, different communities could contain different examples to illustrate the concepts in a locally relevant way.
  • Have a final section of 'possible responses that may be taken' so that people understand that there are a spectrum of response measures

T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 11:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Unusual idea

Lets throw away safety and inclusion together with divercity and transgenderism from Wiki and concentrate on writing Enciclopedia, not left ideas--1Goldberg2 (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hate speech clause

In Section 3.3, third bullet, I would suggest to replace "Hate speech in any form, or discriminatory" with "Any deliberate use of".

Reason: A term like "Hate speech" already carries deeply ingrained definitions which may differ from the one intended here. The rest of the bullet point ("language aimed at...") gives an excellent definition of the prohibited behavior, so it is best to shift the focus to that definition.

Eldar (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

That makes sense. Eissink (talk) 07:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC).
Thank you both for your comments about s3.3 of current Policy text: I have included the suggested change for consideration. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 16:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)