Talk:Home: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by SMK.X DJ (talk) to last revision by LincolnBot
Tag: Rollback
 
(109 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig
[http://wikimediafoundation.org{{localurl:{{PAGENAME}}|&action=purge}} purge cache]
|archive = Talk:Home/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(180d)
|counter = 1
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
}}{{archives}}
{{Contribute}}{{Semiprotected talk}}


== Problem with link ==


Link for ''Board of Trustees'' is incorrect. Unregistered users and readers see [[foundationsite:roles/board/|404]]. All(?) registered users see [https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/rudolph-ampofo/ Rudolph Ampofo] [[User:Proeksad|Proeksad]] ([[User talk:Proeksad|talk]]) 18:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
''see [[meta:Wikimedia site feedback|the feedback page]] for discussion of this site''


:@[[User:Proeksad|Proeksad]]: This has been fixed - thank you for pointing it out! --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 15:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
::@[[User:GVarnum-WMF|GVarnum-WMF]], It doesn't work for authorized non-english users. <nowiki>[[<tvar name="1">foundationsite:role/board/{{Foundationsite language}}</tvar>|Board of Trustees]]</nowiki> but, probably, should be <nowiki>[[<tvar name="1">foundationsite:{{Foundationsite language}}/role/board/</tvar>|Board of Trustees]]</nowiki> because the links are organized differently, not like in projects (https://wikimediafoundation.org/de/role/board/ not https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/de) [[User:Proeksad|Proeksad]] ([[User talk:Proeksad|talk]]) 16:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Proeksad|Proeksad]]: Apologies - I did not notice that error. I have fixed - and will also work on checking the other uses just to make sure I did not repeat the error elsewhere. Again, apologies and thank you for your diligence and help! Also thank you to @[[User:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] for helping flag while I was away. :) --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 18:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)


== How can I report ==
----
== Notes from the editors ==


{{anchor|Urgent revision request}}
There should be a link to the press release on the Home page. [[User:Yann|Yann]] 11:46, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)


How can I report On a Wikipedia page that reports wrong things and protected. The facts is in Wikipedias, yet lies are there [[User:Meynachem&#39;s|Meynachem&#39;s]] ([[User talk:Meynachem&#39;s|talk]]) 17:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
I've increased the width the "about" part of the page occupies to 60% as it contains the most important content, and the amount "below the fold" needed to be reduced. I've also explained the Board on the main page - before that, there was just a single small link to the board page - easily missed. This also provides explanation for the list of board meetings that was already there!


:Hey @[[User:Meynachem's|Meynachem's]], which Wikipedia page are you talking about? Can you please link the page name here? –[[User:Tanbiruzzaman|Tanbiruzzaman]] ([[User talk:Tanbiruzzaman|talk]]) 17:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
The text for the board part is an abridged part of [[Board of trustees]] - the translations should already exist.
::To the Wikipedia Editing Team
::I am writing to request an immediate revision of the Wikipedia article regarding the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion in Gaza City on October 17, 2023. I have concerns about the current articles in Hebrew and Arabic, which present conflicting narratives. This has resulted in confusion and adversely affects Wikipedia's credibility.
::Of utmost concern is the Arabic Wikipedia article, which presents a misleading narrative depicting the incident as an Israeli massacre, despite substantial evidence to the contrary. This misrepresentation not only perpetuates misinformation but also obstructs the pursuit of truth and reconciliation. Moreover, there is a real risk that such inaccuracies could incite violence against innocent individuals, a scenario that we all wish to avoid. Therefore, it is imperative to rectify these inaccuracies and provide a balanced and accurate account of the incident.
::I propose the following actions to address this issue:
::1. Conduct a thorough review of both the Hebrew and Arabic articles to correct inaccuracies and eliminate biases.
::2. Ensure that all references are transparent, encompassing statements from the Israeli Defense Forces, American intelligence agencies, international media reports, and other reliable sources.
::3. Commit to regular updates with the latest credible information to maintain the article's accuracy over time.
::Wikipedia bears a significant responsibility for accurate and transparent reporting, especially in sensitive matters like this. I cannot emphasize enough the urgency of this situation.
::Sincerely, meynachem Here is link to both pages:
::Hebrew*
::https://he.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%94%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%A5_%D7%91%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99_%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%99
::Arabic*
::https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%A9_%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%81%D9%89_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A [[User:Meynachem&#39;s|Meynachem&#39;s]] ([[User talk:Meynachem&#39;s|talk]]) 18:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


:::Hello @[[User:Meynachem's|Meynachem's]]: This request is not within the [[Wikimedia:Scope|scope]] of this particular wiki. Your best route to resolution is to reach out to the Wikimedia volunteers - I recommend trying info-he{{@}}wikimedia.org email for resolution. You can find more about [[m:Volunteer Response Team|this email setup on Meta-Wiki]]. --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 06:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I've also moved the Quarto link to below the Latest news section. It was completely out of place in the "About the..." section, and, being the newsletter, belongs rather more by the news section. [[User:Dan|Dan100]] 17:45, 20 August 2005 (UTC)


== Semi-protect ==
== March 03, 2007 by Florence Devouard, Wikimedia Chair ==


{{edit request|answered=yes}}
March or may ? --[[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]] 22:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Could this page please be semi-protected? It seems to be a spam target. [[User:Pppery|Pppery]] ([[User talk:Pppery|talk]]) 00:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
:March I think, since it was posted to the foundation-l at first in March. But it is my guessing. --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 00:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
::march. I started another report 2 weeks ago, but it is not cooking well. So I thought of putting this one already, since it was more recent than the previous one. [[User:Anthere|Anthere]]
:::Eh-he... Where March - and where are we ? ;) Are need update [[meta:Translation_requests/WMF/Home/source|source for translations]] ? --[[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]] 10:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


:@[[User:Pppery|Pppery]]: Good idea. {{done}} Thank you! --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 21:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
== 15 most visited websites ==

Shall we change this to "one of the 10 most visited websites"? [[User:Cary Bass|Cary Bass]] 21:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

== Columns ==

Right column (news) is much taller than the left one. This is not a good design, and I propose a section to be added to the left side, or the right column being made a little shorter (by archival of older news, perhaps). [[User:Huji|Huji]] 18:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
:I got rid of the January news, so they're about the same now. [[User:Thunderhead|Thunderhead]] 00:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


== I am really sorry ==
to be a pedantic Englishman not an American but "Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment." just doesn't make any sense, particularly "commitment" is the wrong word. "Vision" "Aspiration" "Goal" or "We are committed to this vision" or something? --[[User:AndrewCates|AndrewCates]] 21:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

: Yes, the strap-line has quite a few grammatical issues in British English; I've always belaboured under the impression that it's better (not illiterate) in American English. Here's a slightly more precise (and, possibly, accurate) form:
:: ''O Humanity, consider an existence whereunder we each might freely share all our knowledge; unto that ideal do we strive!''
: (Not meant seriously; hopefully this is obvious.)
: James F. 22:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

== "Sum of all knowledge" ==

As pointed out [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Foundation_wiki_feedback#Fact_.234:_.5B....5D_the_sum_of_all_knowledge. here], I think we should remove the claim of "sum of all knowledge" until the Wikipedias start getting their act together and stop deleting valid articles. This is making us look rather hypocritical. &mdash; [[User:Timwi|Timwi]] 06:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
:There are other Wikimedia projects beside Wikipedia that have less strict inclusion policies. Wikibooks for example. See also [[Vision]] --[[User:Church of emacs|Church of emacs]] 21:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:03, 14 March 2024


Archives
1


Problem with link

Link for Board of Trustees is incorrect. Unregistered users and readers see 404. All(?) registered users see Rudolph Ampofo Proeksad (talk) 18:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Proeksad: This has been fixed - thank you for pointing it out! --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 15:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GVarnum-WMF, It doesn't work for authorized non-english users. [[foundationsite:role/board/{{Foundationsite language}}|Board of Trustees]] but, probably, should be [[foundationsite:{{Foundationsite language}}/role/board/|Board of Trustees]] because the links are organized differently, not like in projects (https://wikimediafoundation.org/de/role/board/ not https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/de) Proeksad (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Proeksad: Apologies - I did not notice that error. I have fixed - and will also work on checking the other uses just to make sure I did not repeat the error elsewhere. Again, apologies and thank you for your diligence and help! Also thank you to @Quiddity (WMF) for helping flag while I was away. :) --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 18:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I report

How can I report On a Wikipedia page that reports wrong things and protected. The facts is in Wikipedias, yet lies are there Meynachem's (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Meynachem's, which Wikipedia page are you talking about? Can you please link the page name here? –Tanbiruzzaman (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To the Wikipedia Editing Team
I am writing to request an immediate revision of the Wikipedia article regarding the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion in Gaza City on October 17, 2023. I have concerns about the current articles in Hebrew and Arabic, which present conflicting narratives. This has resulted in confusion and adversely affects Wikipedia's credibility.
Of utmost concern is the Arabic Wikipedia article, which presents a misleading narrative depicting the incident as an Israeli massacre, despite substantial evidence to the contrary. This misrepresentation not only perpetuates misinformation but also obstructs the pursuit of truth and reconciliation. Moreover, there is a real risk that such inaccuracies could incite violence against innocent individuals, a scenario that we all wish to avoid. Therefore, it is imperative to rectify these inaccuracies and provide a balanced and accurate account of the incident.
I propose the following actions to address this issue:
1. Conduct a thorough review of both the Hebrew and Arabic articles to correct inaccuracies and eliminate biases.
2. Ensure that all references are transparent, encompassing statements from the Israeli Defense Forces, American intelligence agencies, international media reports, and other reliable sources.
3. Commit to regular updates with the latest credible information to maintain the article's accuracy over time.
Wikipedia bears a significant responsibility for accurate and transparent reporting, especially in sensitive matters like this. I cannot emphasize enough the urgency of this situation.
Sincerely, meynachem Here is link to both pages:
Hebrew*
https://he.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%94%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%A5_%D7%91%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99_%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%99
Arabic*
https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%A9_%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%81%D9%89_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A Meynachem's (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Meynachem's: This request is not within the scope of this particular wiki. Your best route to resolution is to reach out to the Wikimedia volunteers - I recommend trying info-he@wikimedia.org email for resolution. You can find more about this email setup on Meta-Wiki. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 06:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect

Could this page please be semi-protected? It seems to be a spam target. Pppery (talk) 00:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery: Good idea.  Done Thank you! --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 21:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]