Talk:RFP/2013 Datacenter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m typo (and ouch, thought this was on mw:) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deadline== |
==Deadline== |
||
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
:We're only looking for proposal intent here - not necessarily a finalized proposal, so the deadline isn't quite as short in that scenario. But yes, I believe three weeks is long enough to reach out to interested parties, and at least find out that they intend to participate. [[User:KSnider (WMF)|KSnider (WMF)]] ([[User talk:KSnider (WMF)|talk]]) 23:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:34, 21 October 2013
Deadline
Why so early a deadline? Are three weeks usually considered enough in USA/this industry? How is the RfP being advertised? --Nemo 17:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- We're only looking for proposal intent here - not necessarily a finalized proposal, so the deadline isn't quite as short in that scenario. But yes, I believe three weeks is long enough to reach out to interested parties, and at least find out that they intend to participate. KSnider (WMF) (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)