Resolution:Biographies of living people/ru: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Removing from Category:Governance wiki using Cat-a-lot
Tag: Manual revert
FuzzyBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
67,418 edits
Updating to match new version of source page
Line 1: Line 1:
<languages />
{{BLPLang}}
{{Template:BLPLang}}
{{resolution/ru
{{resolution
|title =Биографии живущих людей
|title = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Biographies of living people</span>
|notes =Это решение, принятое в апреле 2009 года, содержит позицию Фонда в отношении биографий живущих людей.
|notes = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was [[Special:MyLanguage/Resolution:Media about living people|'''amended''']] in November 2013.</span>
|english=Resolution:Biographies of living people
|status = passed
}}
|year = 2009
Фонд Викимедиа пользуется этой возможностью, чтобы напомнить о некоторых основных принципах, связанных с нашим видением, миссией и ценностями. Одна из этих ценностей, общая для всех наших проектов, это обязательство придерживаться нейтральной точки зрения.
}}<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
В наших усилиях по созданию источника знаний, который ценен и полезен для всех, мы обязаны придерживаться этих ценностей, предоставляя достоверную информацию. Участники проектов Викимедиа создали обширные ресурсы с широким охватом. Как мы подчеркиваем уже несколько лет, помимо увеличения доступных знаний, не менее важным вопросом является их качество. Ряд исследований подтвердил в целом высокое качество информации в проектах Викимедиа, однако важно, что мы всегда стремимся стать лучше. Как и в любой работе, несущей образовательную и информационную нагрузку, нужно стараться избегать ошибок — особенно когда они могут причинить вред. Одна из областей, к которой это относится — написание статей о живущих людях.
In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Всё чаще статьи из проектов Викимедиа оказываются среди первых результатов поисковых систем в ответ на практически любой вопрос. Это означает, что когда потенциальный работодатель, коллега, друг, сосед или знакомый ищут информацию о человеке, они могут найти её на сайтах Викимедиа. Возрастающая популярность проектов Викимедиа повышает и степень ответственности сообщества редакторов за то, чтобы статьи о живущих людях были написаны нейтрально, аккуратно и на основе надёжных источников.
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
С ростом нашей популярности стали более заметны некоторые проблемы:
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:
* Многие люди пишут статьи в чересчур рекламных тонах: о себе, о людях, которыми они восхищаются, или о тех, кто оплатил им создание статьи. Они не нейтральны и им нет места в наших проектах. В основном, сообщество Викимедиа защищает проекты от этой общей проблемы, удаляя или улучшая агиографии.
</div>
* Некоторые портят статьи о ныне живущих людях. Сообщество Викимедиа разработало инструменты и методы для противодействия вандализму — и в целом они достаточно хорошо работают.
* Некоторые статьи о живущих людях содержат небольшие ошибки, плохо написаны, либо неточны. Статьями о малоизвестных людях часто пренебрегают, они гораздо медленнее улучшаются с течением времени, если это вообще происходит.
* Люди иногда вносят изменения, направленные на очернение других. Такие действия трудно определить и противодействовать им — особенно в случае настойчивости редактора, который их совершает.


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Совет попечителей Фонда Викимедиа настоятельно призывает международное сообщество Викимедиа поддерживать и укреплять свою приверженность принципам предоставления высококачественной и точной информации, а именно:
* Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
# Обеспечить во всех проектах на всех языках при описании живущих людей соблюдение принципов нейтральности и проверяемости изложенных в этих статьях фактов;
* People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
# Принимать во внимание при добавлении и удалении информации вопросы соблюдения человеческого достоинства и уважения к личной жизни; в особенности — в отношении сиюминутных или маргинальных вопросов;
</div>
# Развивать новые технические механизмы проверки вносимых изменений — особенно, когда это затрагивает живущих людей, а также те, которые дают возможность читателям сообщать о проблеме;
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# Проявлять терпение, доброту и уважение при рассмотрении жалоб от любых лиц на то, как они описаны в наших проектах; а также призывать других действовать таким же образом.
* Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
* People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.
</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:
</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
# Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
</div>
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
# Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.
</div>

Revision as of 04:59, 30 September 2023

Other languages:

Template:BLPLang

←Решения Biographies of living people Обратная связь?→
This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was amended in November 2013.

The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view.

In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people.

Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.

As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:

  • Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
  • People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
  • Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
  • People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:

  1. Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
  2. Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
  1. Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
  2. Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.
Retrieved from "https://foundation.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people/ru&oldid=284940"