Wikimedia Foundation releases gender equity report

The newly-released report highlights the experiences of 65 Wikimedians working toward gender equity on Wikimedia projects.

In April 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Community Resources team launched the Gender Diversity Mapping Project to gather feedback from Wikimedians at the forefront of gender equity efforts in the Wikimedia movement.  Our plan was to identify active movement leaders and document what they have learned from their work so far.  We had three goals in mind for this project:

  • To strengthen the network of learning and sharing among gender equity advocates across the movement
  • To better inform the larger Wikimedia community about the scope of gender equity advocacy across the globe, as well as some of the unique successes and challenges it faces
  • To inspire new initiatives and partnerships, including with organizations working on gender equity

In total, we conducted 65 interviews across 29 countries. The principal interviewer was Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, also known by her editor handle Rosiestep. Stephenson-Goodknight is a co-founder of the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group, which strives toward better representation of women, including members of the LGBT community who identify as women, and non-binary genders.

Aggregate summaries from these interviews are now available in a newly released report, Advancing Gender Equity: Conversations with movement leaders.  The report describes the achievements, best practices, and barriers for gender equity work in the Wikimedia context, from the perspectives of some of the most active leaders in the movement.

Wiki Loves Women edit-a-thon.

Motivation and successes

In the inspiring change section of the report, a gallery of 15 projects—ranging from Wikimujeres & Editona to Women’s History Month, India—illustrate the geographic range and diversity of gender equity work in the movement.  This section also explores some of the core values that inspire participants to get involved in gender equity work.  Some of the many motivations include centering marginalized communities and intersectional knowledge, meeting people where they are and celebrating everyone’s contributions rather than creating a hierarchy of participation.

Best practices

The report highlights six best practices that participants identified as the most effective tactics they use in their gender equity work:

  • Host in-person events, like editathons and other meetups
  • Focus on creating content, like writing Wikipedia articles or taking and uploading photos
  • Focus on intersectional knowledge, intentionally prioritizing awareness and inclusion of those who have are subject to unjust social bias for any reason, not only their gender
  • Track progress, like number of articles created, or number of editors recruited.  It motivates participants see what they have accomplished collectively.
  • Recruit new participants, rather than only focusing on veteran contributors.
  • Cultivate partnerships with allied organizations who are committed to gender equity.  These partnerships often lead to mutual contributions of fresh energy, motivation and resources.

Barriers to gender equity

The report discusses the main barriers to gender equity in the Wikimedia movement, focusing on systemic bias in policies, lack of awareness and implicit bias in the community, and poor community health.

Systemic bias in policies: “Notability is a challenge when you are doing any wiki work because of the way it’s structured, it’s geared towards the white male perspective.”

Wikimedia policies replicate the systemic biases of the larger culture. Consequently, social groups negatively impacted by these biases–including non-males and other marginalized groups–are obstructed from full and accurate representation in Wikipedia articles.

Lack of awareness / implicit bias within community: “There is a facade of listening to voices in the community, we don’t honor our women contributors, the marginalized community. We cave in to misogyny without recognizing it.”

Eighteen percent of participants described a lack of awareness shaped by implicit bias as the main challenge to their work.  Implicitly, male perspectives are unconsciously privileged as normal on Wikimedia projects, while alternative perspectives are dismissed, minimized or even outright denied.

Poor community health: “I don’t communicate on-wiki about this stuff. It’s a honey-pot for trolls.”

Fourteen percent of participants described poor community health as the major challenge they face, pointing to harassment, a lack of support for gender equity work and a lack of gender diversity in leadership as prominent themes.

Further highlights from the report will be shared with the Wikimedia movement through a virtual community event on 9 October. In the coming months, we hope to simplify some of the information included in report to make it easier to share through social media.  We envision infographics, a reusable slide deck and other materials that Wikimedians can use to share ideas across their Wikimedia communities.  We hope that by making this information as widely available as possible, it will encourage more people to help advance gender equity.

The Advancing Gender Equity report describes much that we can celebrate about the work of dedicated advocates who are changing the Wikimedia landscape into a more inclusive space—one that better reflects the full diversity of human knowledge.  However, it also delivers a troubling message about the ways that Wikimedia projects and communities are deeply shaped by structural and social inequity that privileges some groups of people over others.  The Wikimedia movement invites the world to imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.  If that’s truly our commitment, then this report delivers a sobering call to Wikimedians to do more to prioritize the knowledge and communities that have been left out by structures of power and privilege.  Our strategic focus on knowledge equity signals that we are collectively turning toward this challenge with new focus, and we hope this report can offer Wikimedians concrete insight into where to apply their efforts.

Questions about the report can be directed to Alex Wang at awang[at]wikimedia[dot]org and Marti Johnson at mjohnson[at]wikimedia[dot]org.

Marti Johnson, Program Officer, Individual Grants, Community Resources
Alex Wang, Senior Program Officer, Community Resources
Wikimedia Foundation

This blog post has been updated to add the upcoming community event on 9 October 2018.


Read further in the pursuit of knowledge

Project Rewrite 2022 banner

Ten ways to close the gender gap on Wikipedia and beyond

Women’s History Month in March serves as a designated time to commemorate women and highlight their contributions to society. As we showcase the many women who have shaped our world, however, their struggles to be recognized and seen for their many achievements also become clear. This is especially true in the information landscape, the universe….

Read more

What we learned about closing Wikipedia’s gender gap using a classroom assignment

Assigning Wikipedia as a classroom assignment is a difficult proposition. The idea of integrating the encyclopedia into a curriculum has been stigmatized for many years, and it can be complicated to ensure that students’ work fits into Wikipedia’s extensive policies and guidelines. Over the last decade, however, a brave cadre of professors and teachers have….

Read more

Smithsonian brings images of diverse figures from the history of US women’s suffrage to Wikimedia

The Smithsonian—one of the leading museums and research centers in the United States—has added over 200 images of women involved in the battle for women’s suffrage in the country to Wikimedia Commons, one of the world’s largest collections of freely licensed media. The donation helps advance the Smithsonian’s strategic plan, which calls for reaching one….

Read more

Help us unlock the world’s knowledge.

As a nonprofit, Wikipedia and our related free knowledge projects are powered primarily through donations.

Donate now

Contact us

Questions about the Wikimedia Foundation or our projects? Get in touch with our team.

Photo credits