A German court forced us to remove part of a Wikipedia article’s ‘history.’ Here’s what that means.

Legal Wikipedia

Three months ago, a German court ruled that part of a Wikipedia article—found to be defamatory in a previous court decision—had to be removed from both the article and its associated revision tracker, known as a “history” page. (History pages allow anyone to see how a Wikipedia article has developed since they were created, in….

Read more

Victory in Greece: Legal case ended against Wikipedia editor

From the archives Legal

A long-running case in Greece has come to a close with all claims dropped.

Read more

Victory in Italy: Wikimedia wins lawsuit against former Minister of Defense

Foundation From the archives Legal Wikipedia

The Rome Court of Appeals has ruled strongly in Wikimedia’s favor in Previti v. Wikimedia Foundation. It protected accurate, well-sourced articles, and held that when someone has a concern, they should work through community processes, not try to bypass them with legal demands.

Read more

Discussing fake news and the NSA lawsuit at Yale

From the archives Legal Wikimedia v. NSA

As part of our ongoing affiliation and collaboration with Yale Law School, members of the Foundation’s legal team recently participated in two events focused on the issue of fake news and the Wikimedia v. NSA lawsuit.

Read more

Wikimedia Foundation removes The Diary of Anne Frank due to copyright law requirements

From the archives Legal Wikisource

Today, in an unfortunate example of the overreach of the United States' current copyright law, the Wikimedia Foundation removed the Dutch-language text of The Diary of Anne Frank from Wikisource.

Read more